-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 675
Revise governance review process #1930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Updated the Governance Reviewer Role Handbook to clarify the review process and fix links. Signed-off-by: Josh Gavant <4421720+joshgav@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@mrbobbytables WDYT? |
TheFoxAtWork
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
| * The reviewer has some other close personal relationship with one or more leaders of the project | ||
|
|
||
| If you are assigned a project that triggers a conflict of interest, please alert one of the leads for the Governance WG so that you can be re-assigned. | ||
| If you are assigned a project that triggers a conflict of interest, please alert one of the leads for the Governance WG so that you can be re-assigned. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update to Project Reviews Subproject please!
|
|
||
| * Questions and answers required for the governance review may have been answered in a matriculation application for a project. Be sure to review that first. The reviewer's job is to a) review and confirm what has been submitted and b) research the project's repos and structure to be sure answers are accurate and complete. | ||
| * Questions, issues and clarifications required during the process of the review should be put in the Governance Review issue so that they are public for future viewers and TOC members to consider. | ||
| * At the reviewers' discretion they may contact project submitters and maintainers in CNCF Slack for deeper conversations, but remember to record significant items in the public issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please keep discussions in a public forum for community scale -- whether it is the document, public slack channel or on the issue itself. Please link everything on the issue!
Updated the Governance Reviewer Role Handbook to clarify the review process and fix links.