⚡️ Speed up method JavaAssertTransformer._find_balanced_parens by 41% in PR #1199 (omni-java)#1629
Merged
claude[bot] merged 2 commits intoomni-javafrom Feb 21, 2026
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **41% runtime improvement** by replacing character-by-character iteration with regex-based scanning to find special characters (`'`, `"`, `(`, `)`). ## Key Optimization **Original approach**: Iterates through every character in the code string (26,253 iterations in profiler), checking each one against multiple conditions. **Optimized approach**: Uses `self._special_re.search(code, pos)` to jump directly to the next special character (only 4,621 iterations in profiler), reducing iteration count by **~82%**. ## Why This Works 1. **Reduces iteration overhead**: In typical Java code, special characters are sparse. The regex engine (implemented in C) efficiently scans to the next occurrence, skipping irrelevant characters like alphanumerics, whitespace, and operators. 2. **Per-character cost reduction**: The profiler shows the original `while pos < end and depth > 0:` line alone consumed 15.6% of runtime with ~190ns per hit. The optimized version's `m = self._special_re.search(code, pos)` takes ~525ns per hit but executes 5.6x fewer times, resulting in net savings. 3. **Elimination of escape tracking**: The original tracked `prev_char` for every iteration. The optimized version checks `code[i - 1]` only when needed (at special character positions), avoiding 26,253 assignments. ## Performance Characteristics The optimization excels when processing: - **Large flat content** (many arguments): 1051% faster on 1000 comma-separated elements because it skips over all the commas and identifiers - **Long strings with few special chars**: 74.5% faster on large strings because it jumps past text content - **Mixed content**: 13.5-53% faster on realistic mixed structures Trade-off for deeply nested structures: - **Deep nesting** (500 levels): 68% slower because regex overhead dominates when every character is a paren. This is acceptable since deeply nested structures are rare in practice. The acceptance is justified by the significant runtime improvement on realistic code patterns where special characters represent a small fraction of total characters.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
PR Review SummaryPrek ChecksStatus: ✅ Passing after fix Fixed 1 issue:
mypy: ✅ No issues found in Code ReviewNo critical issues found. The optimization replaces character-by-character iteration in
Note: Both original and optimized code share a limitation with double-escaped characters (e.g., Test Coverage
This file is new (does not exist on Last updated: 2026-02-21 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1199
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
omni-java.📄 41% (0.41x) speedup for
JavaAssertTransformer._find_balanced_parensincodeflash/languages/java/remove_asserts.py⏱️ Runtime :
2.56 milliseconds→1.81 milliseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 41% runtime improvement by replacing character-by-character iteration with regex-based scanning to find special characters (
',",(,)).Key Optimization
Original approach: Iterates through every character in the code string (26,253 iterations in profiler), checking each one against multiple conditions.
Optimized approach: Uses
self._special_re.search(code, pos)to jump directly to the next special character (only 4,621 iterations in profiler), reducing iteration count by ~82%.Why This Works
Reduces iteration overhead: In typical Java code, special characters are sparse. The regex engine (implemented in C) efficiently scans to the next occurrence, skipping irrelevant characters like alphanumerics, whitespace, and operators.
Per-character cost reduction: The profiler shows the original
while pos < end and depth > 0:line alone consumed 15.6% of runtime with ~190ns per hit. The optimized version'sm = self._special_re.search(code, pos)takes ~525ns per hit but executes 5.6x fewer times, resulting in net savings.Elimination of escape tracking: The original tracked
prev_charfor every iteration. The optimized version checkscode[i - 1]only when needed (at special character positions), avoiding 26,253 assignments.Performance Characteristics
The optimization excels when processing:
Trade-off for deeply nested structures:
The acceptance is justified by the significant runtime improvement on realistic code patterns where special characters represent a small fraction of total characters.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1199-2026-02-21T00.19.00and push.