⚡️ Speed up method CodeStringsMarkdown.file_to_path by 54% in PR #1199 (omni-java)#1637
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up method CodeStringsMarkdown.file_to_path by 54% in PR #1199 (omni-java)#1637codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
CodeStringsMarkdown.file_to_path by 54% in PR #1199 (omni-java)#1637codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoomni-javafrom
Conversation
The optimization achieves a **54% runtime improvement** by replacing the cache check pattern from "if key in dict" + "return dict[key]" to a more Pythonic "try/except KeyError" approach. **Key Performance Gain:** In the original code, the cache hit path (which occurs in 99% of calls based on the test annotations) performs **two dictionary lookups**: 1. `"file_to_path" in self._cache` - checks key existence 2. `return self._cache["file_to_path"]` - retrieves the value The optimized version uses **EAFP (Easier to Ask for Forgiveness than Permission)** pattern with try/except, which performs only **one dictionary lookup** on the happy path: 1. `return self._cache["file_to_path"]` - directly retrieves the value (or raises KeyError) **Why This Is Faster:** The line profiler data confirms this improvement. For the cached case (1002 out of 1012 calls): - **Original**: Lines checking "if in cache" + return take 6.13ms total (3.21ms + 2.92ms) - **Optimized**: Try + return takes only 3.36ms (0.11ms + 3.25ms) The try/except pattern in Python is highly optimized at the C level. When no exception occurs (the common case), the overhead is minimal - just the cost of setting up the exception handler, which is cheaper than performing two dictionary hash lookups and comparisons. **Test Case Performance:** The optimization particularly excels in scenarios with repeated cache hits: - `test_cache_prevents_recomputation_and_returns_same_object`: 63.5% faster on second call - `test_empty_code_strings_returns_empty_dict_and_caches_it`: 72.6% faster on second call - `test_large_number_of_repeated_calls_consistent_results`: **84.6% faster** when calling 1000 times in a loop For first-time computations (cache miss), performance is nearly identical since both versions execute the same dictionary comprehension and caching logic.
Contributor
PR Review SummaryPrek Checks✅ All checks passed — no formatting or linting issues found. Mypy✅ No new type errors introduced. All mypy errors in Code Review✅ No critical issues found. The change replaces a two-lookup cache pattern (
Test Coverage
Last updated: 2026-02-21 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1199
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
omni-java.📄 54% (0.54x) speedup for
CodeStringsMarkdown.file_to_pathincodeflash/models/models.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.38 milliseconds→2.84 milliseconds(best of19runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 54% runtime improvement by replacing the cache check pattern from "if key in dict" + "return dict[key]" to a more Pythonic "try/except KeyError" approach.
Key Performance Gain:
In the original code, the cache hit path (which occurs in 99% of calls based on the test annotations) performs two dictionary lookups:
"file_to_path" in self._cache- checks key existencereturn self._cache["file_to_path"]- retrieves the valueThe optimized version uses EAFP (Easier to Ask for Forgiveness than Permission) pattern with try/except, which performs only one dictionary lookup on the happy path:
return self._cache["file_to_path"]- directly retrieves the value (or raises KeyError)Why This Is Faster:
The line profiler data confirms this improvement. For the cached case (1002 out of 1012 calls):
The try/except pattern in Python is highly optimized at the C level. When no exception occurs (the common case), the overhead is minimal - just the cost of setting up the exception handler, which is cheaper than performing two dictionary hash lookups and comparisons.
Test Case Performance:
The optimization particularly excels in scenarios with repeated cache hits:
test_cache_prevents_recomputation_and_returns_same_object: 63.5% faster on second calltest_empty_code_strings_returns_empty_dict_and_caches_it: 72.6% faster on second calltest_large_number_of_repeated_calls_consistent_results: 84.6% faster when calling 1000 times in a loopFor first-time computations (cache miss), performance is nearly identical since both versions execute the same dictionary comprehension and caching logic.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1199-2026-02-21T02.25.47and push.