⚡️ Speed up function find_last_node by 9,219%#269
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intooptimizefrom
Closed
⚡️ Speed up function find_last_node by 9,219%#269codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intooptimizefrom
find_last_node by 9,219%#269codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intooptimizefrom
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **92x speedup (9218%)** by eliminating redundant comparisons through preprocessing. The key optimization transforms an O(n*m) nested loop into O(n+m) linear operations.
**Primary Optimization:**
Instead of checking `all(e["source"] != n["id"] for e in edges)` for every node (which iterates through all edges for each node), the optimized code:
1. Pre-builds a set of source IDs: `sources = {e["source"] for e in edges}` (O(m) operation)
2. Uses set membership testing: `n["id"] not in sources` (O(1) lookup per node)
This is particularly effective for graphs with many edges, as demonstrated by the test results:
- **Large-scale test (1000 nodes, 999 edges):** 18.0ms → 89.5μs (**20000% faster**)
- **Sparse edges test (500 nodes, 250 edges):** 11.4μs → 8.25μs (38.4% faster)
- Small graphs show minor regression due to preprocessing overhead: empty cases are 36-48% slower
**Why Set-Based Lookup is Faster:**
- Set construction and membership testing in Python are highly optimized hash table operations
- The nested loop approach requires m comparisons per node, totaling n*m comparisons
- Set approach does m hash insertions once, then n constant-time lookups
**Error Handling Preservation:**
The optimized code carefully preserves the original's lazy evaluation semantics:
- Falls back to the original nested check if sources are unhashable (TypeError during set construction)
- Falls back for individual nodes if accessing `n["id"]` fails (KeyError/TypeError)
- This ensures the function only raises exceptions when the original code would, maintaining backward compatibility
**Trade-offs:**
The optimization excels when edges are numerous or nodes are iterated extensively. Small graphs (< 10 elements) see slight slowdowns (5-21%) due to set construction overhead, but this is negligible compared to the massive gains on realistic workloads where this function would typically be called on larger graph structures.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 9,219% (92.19x) speedup for
find_last_nodeinsrc/algorithms/graph.py⏱️ Runtime :
27.1 milliseconds→291 microseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 92x speedup (9218%) by eliminating redundant comparisons through preprocessing. The key optimization transforms an O(n*m) nested loop into O(n+m) linear operations.
Primary Optimization:
Instead of checking
all(e["source"] != n["id"] for e in edges)for every node (which iterates through all edges for each node), the optimized code:sources = {e["source"] for e in edges}(O(m) operation)n["id"] not in sources(O(1) lookup per node)This is particularly effective for graphs with many edges, as demonstrated by the test results:
Why Set-Based Lookup is Faster:
Error Handling Preservation:
The optimized code carefully preserves the original's lazy evaluation semantics:
n["id"]fails (KeyError/TypeError)Trade-offs:
The optimization excels when edges are numerous or nodes are iterated extensively. Small graphs (< 10 elements) see slight slowdowns (5-21%) due to set construction overhead, but this is negligible compared to the massive gains on realistic workloads where this function would typically be called on larger graph structures.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-find_last_node-mlde6cg3and push.