Adding Guenther-2022-30 from Concepticon#317
Conversation
|
I've refined the abbreviations for the languages in this list. |
AnnikaTjuka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for adding all these variables. I have just a few comments.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @article{Penfield1937, | ||
| title={Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation.}, |
| @inproceedings{Jakubivcek2013, | ||
| title={The TenTen Corpus Family}, | ||
| author={Jakub{\'\i}{\v{c}}ek, Milo{\v{s}} and Kilgarriff, Adam and Kov{\'a}{\v{r}}, Vojt{\v{e}}ch and Rychl{\`y}, Pavel and Suchomel, V{\'\i}t}, | ||
| booktitle={7th international corpus linguistics conference CL}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please capitalise the name of the conference.
| pages={125--127}, | ||
| year={2013}, | ||
| address = {Lancaster}, | ||
| publisher = {UCREL} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please spell out the name of the publisher.
| journal={New England Journal of Medicine}, | ||
| volume={317}, | ||
| number={17}, | ||
| pages={1098}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add the pages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This source was the one where I couldn't find a page range anywhere, so I assume the original is more like a 1-page diagram rather than an actual article?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it's indeed a one-page "article". I found it somewhere on the web.
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_AUDITORY_MEAN mean sensory modality auditory ratings users en The mean rating of intensity of sound produced by an object on an 8-point scale (1= not at all loud, 8 = extremely loud) given by participants. | ||
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_GRASP_MEAN mean sensory modality grasp ratings users en The mean rating of graspability ("How likely is someone to grasp this object with one hand?") on an 8-point scale (1 = extremely unlikely, 8 = extremely likely) given by participants. | ||
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_MOTION_MEAN mean sensory modality motion ratings users en The mean rating of likeliness of motion ("When one sees this object, how likely is it to be in motion?") on an 8-point scale (1 = extremely unlikely, 8 = extremely likely) given by participants. | ||
| Guenther-2022-30 ENGLISH_FREQUENCY tokens frequency norms corpus en Baroni2009 The total number of lemma occurences in the WaCKy corpus ([Baroni et al. 2009)](:bib:Baroni2009). The frequency for the item jaw and teeth was estimated as the sum of the frequencies for jaw and teeth. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd put "jaw" and "theet" in quotation marks. (also applies to the other rows)
| Dimitropoulou-2010-Frequency GREEK_CD_LOG logarithmic contextual diversity norms corpus el Log10 (contexts+1) of the different contexts (films and television series) a word appears in. | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017a-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_PERCENTAGE percentage valence best-worst ratings users en The mean rating of valence obtained through best-worst ratings (BWS). Participants were presented with 4-tuples (i.e., four different words from the list at once) and asked to select which word they found the most positive and which the most negative one. Each word occured multiple times in different 4-tuple formations but the same word never occured more than once within the same 4-tuple. The data was processed using the counting procedure: each term’s score was calculated as the percentage of times it was chosen as most positive minus the percentage of times the term was chosen as most negative. The scores range from −1 (most negative) to 1 (most positive). | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017b-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_MEAN mean valence ratings users en The mean rating of valence on a 9-point scale ranging from −4 to 4 (-4 = extremely negative, 0 = not at all positive or negative, 4 = extremely positive). The data was converted into scores ranging from 1 to 9, as presented here. No newline at end of file | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017b-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_MEAN mean valence ratings users en The mean rating of valence on a 9-point scale ranging from −4 to 4 (-4 = extremely negative, 0 = not at all positive or negative, 4 = extremely positive). The data was converted into scores ranging from 1 to 9, as presented here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think "as presented here" can be deleted.
AnnikaTjuka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, thanks!
Adding Guenther-2022-30 from Concepticon, based on Language statistics as a window into mental representations by Günther & Rinaldi (2022).
This list is big in the sense that there's a lot of variables:
In
references.bib, there's only one page listed for Mosteller1987 instead of a page range. I could not access the original work to check, but various sources only list one page or a range only spanning one page for this source. In the original New England Journal of Medicine, it is also listed as only taking up one page, so I assume it is more like a (mathematical) diagram rather than an article in the classical sense.This PR also changed faulty
RATINGvalues innorare.tsvfor twoFREQUENCYvariables in Binder-2016-AffectiveRatings.