Bump Buildah to v1.44.0

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

Vendor in Buildah v1.44.0 in preparation for Podman v6.0

9 build tests had to be skipped to make this work. This is recorded in #28810 and we should circle back to tie them up.

Checklist

Ensure you have completed the following checklist for your pull request to be reviewed:

• Certify you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch by signing all
  commits. (git commit -s). (If needed, use git commit -s --amend). The author email must match
  the sign-off email address. See CONTRIBUTING.md
  for more information.
• Referenced issues using Fixes: #00000 in commit message (if applicable)
• Tests have been added/updated (or no tests are needed)
• Documentation has been updated (or no documentation changes are needed)
• All commits pass make validatepr (format/lint checks)
• Release note entered in the section below (or None if no user-facing changes)

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

@mheon OK to add the bloat label to this?

[mheon]

Done

[mheon]

And LGTM for reference

[Luap99]

New cli options need to be integrated first, I really thought we had people doing these things ahead of time by now...

[mheon]

Well, we did a preparatory vendor, but that was a few weeks back and a lot of stuff got merged into Buildah before the release happened.

[Luap99]

Well, we did a preparatory vendor, but that was a few weeks back and a lot of stuff got merged into Buildah before the release happened.

which is my point, we started a release without doing the prep vendor right before the release, which means we do not even know if this will pass podman CI technically

[Luap99]

New options need to be fully wired in, cli, remote bindings and API... it is not just the docs that are missing.
e.g. efba999

[nalind]

Taking a run at that in #28807.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

I just very liberally stole from @nalind 's #22807 for the API calls and added another commit. TYVM @nalind!

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

Next Failure:

5s] Summarizing 1 Failure:
[+1085s]   [FAIL] Podman UserNS support [It] podman build with --userns=auto
[+1085s]   /var/tmp/go/src/github.com/containers/podman/test/e2e/run_userns_test.go:66
[+1085s] 
[+1085s] Ran 2221 of 2498 Specs in 947.486 seconds

Any Thoughts?

I'm having trouble running the command locally as a non-root user, I think due to the changes in the conf files.

[nalind]

Next Failure:

5s] Summarizing 1 Failure:
[+1085s]   [FAIL] Podman UserNS support [It] podman build with --userns=auto
[+1085s]   /var/tmp/go/src/github.com/containers/podman/test/e2e/run_userns_test.go:66
[+1085s] 
[+1085s] Ran 2221 of 2498 Specs in 947.486 seconds

Any Thoughts?

Some query parameters were dropped at https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/28805/changes#diff-43fd97ffbb9420a1f310fa0f6a07e2c6ea1d4deb0eefc76ae13812102c11c65fL171 which probably shouldn't have been.

[nalind]

I'm having trouble running the command locally as a non-root user, I think due to the changes in the conf files.

I often have to prefix a command with env CONTAINERS_STORAGE_CONF=/dev/null to not pick up location settings from the older default system-wide configuration.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

Thanks @nalind, I'll re-add that block that was removed. That may indeed be it.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

3 Failing tests, and a half dozen failing build tests. At least some I suspect are due to config file changes. For now, I've added a commit to skip them.

[packit-as-a-service]

[NON-BLOCKING] Packit jobs failed. @containers/packit-build please check. Everyone else, feel free to ignore.

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

I think the remainders are flakes. @lsm5 if you could eyeball, I'd appreciate it.

[lsm5]

LGTM

[Luap99]

LGTM, I am concerned with the bunch of new test skips here though I agree lets get this landed first

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

@Luap99 fwiw, I had created #28810 for the removed test and have added a note about it to the description.