Conversation
- remove legacy migrations - remove unused server code - remove unused UI code
refactor: implement groups in editor
* fix test * add comment
* use ms for api calls * change it in UI * update comment * rename variables * refactor: addtime api logic
* change flush to one patch * remove unused types * create batch * merge patch into eventStore Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: generateUniqueFileName * loadProject should not generate new names * update comments * extract and test getProjectNumber * spell * finish jsdoc * use getProjectNumber * cleanup loadProject * create a `incrementProjectNumber` function * spelling Co-authored-by: Carlos Valente <34649812+cpvalente@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Valente <34649812+cpvalente@users.noreply.github.com>
- rename dissolve > ungroup - prevent ondrag when clicking - add untitled as block title fallback - move block action to context menu
Contributor
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Owner
|
I am convinced, lets do this when we create the multiple rundowns |
cpvalente
force-pushed
the
v4
branch
3 times, most recently
from
99f01c6 to
05d01e0
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.