Skip to content

Conversation

@m-abulazm
Copy link
Contributor

@m-abulazm m-abulazm commented Dec 4, 2025

Keep integration and unit test scopes only

prerequisite to #2145

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.66%. Comparing base (eebf284) to head (dd63962).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2179      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.24%   63.66%   -1.59%     
==========================================
  Files         100      100              
  Lines        8506     8506              
  Branches      876      876              
==========================================
- Hits         5550     5415     -135     
- Misses       2769     2926     +157     
+ Partials      187      165      -22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

✅ 51/51 passed, 10 flaky, 4m37s total

Flaky tests:

  • 🤪 test_validate_invalid_source_tech (145ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_table_not_found (1ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_mixed_checks (387ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_non_empty_tables (8ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_invalid_schema_path (2ms)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql_non_interactive[True] (24.706s)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql (24.663s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql_non_interactive[False] (26.801s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql (28.264s)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql_non_interactive[False] (4.374s)

Running from acceptance #3109

@m-abulazm m-abulazm marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 16:39
@m-abulazm m-abulazm requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2025 16:39
@m-abulazm m-abulazm self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants