Fix llvm assertions v2 #7
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EricWF
commented
Nov 1, 2024
| void LazyCallGraph::RefSCC::switchTrivialInternalEdgeToRef(Node &SourceN, | ||
| Node &TargetN) { | ||
| assert((*SourceN)[TargetN].isCall() && "Must start with a call edge!"); | ||
| assert_DISABLED((*SourceN)[TargetN].isCall() && "Must start with a call edge!"); |
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2025
…lvm#144097) In Aya/Rust, BPF map definitions are nested in two nested types: * A struct representing the map type (e.g., `HashMap`, `RingBuf`) that provides methods for interacting with the map type (e.g. `HashMap::get`, `RingBuf::reserve`). * An `UnsafeCell`, which informs the Rust compiler that the type is thread-safe and can be safely mutated even as a global variable. The kernel guarantees map operation safety. This leads to a type hierarchy like: ```rust pub struct HashMap<K, V, const M: usize, const F: usize = 0>( core::cell::UnsafeCell<HashMapDef<K, V, M, F>>, ); const BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH: usize = 1; pub struct HashMapDef<K, V, const M: usize, const F: usize = 0> { r#type: *const [i32; BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH], key: *const K, value: *const V, max_entries: *const [i32; M], map_flags: *const [i32; F], } ``` Then used in the BPF program code as a global variable: ```rust #[link_section = ".maps"] static HASH_MAP: HashMap<u32, u32, 1337> = HashMap::new(); ``` Which is an equivalent of the following BPF map definition in C: ```c #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH 1 struct { int (*type)[BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH]; typeof(int) *key; typeof(int) *value; int (*max_entries)[1337]; } map_1 __attribute__((section(".maps"))); ``` Accessing the actual map definition requires traversing: ``` HASH_MAP -> __0 -> value ``` Previously, the BPF backend only visited the pointee types of the outermost struct, and didn’t descend into inner wrappers. This caused issues when the key/value types were custom structs: ```rust // Define custom structs for key and values. pub struct MyKey(u32); pub struct MyValue(u32); #[link_section = ".maps"] #[export_name = "HASH_MAP"] pub static HASH_MAP: HashMap<MyKey, MyValue, 10> = HashMap::new(); ``` These types weren’t fully visited and appeared in BTF as forward declarations: ``` llvm#30: <FWD> 'MyKey' kind:struct llvm#31: <FWD> 'MyValue' kind:struct ``` The fix is to enhance `visitMapDefType` to recursively visit inner composite members. If a member is a composite type (likely a wrapper), it is now also visited using `visitMapDefType`, ensuring that the pointee types of the innermost stuct members, like `MyKey` and `MyValue`, are fully resolved in BTF. With this fix, the correct BTF entries are emitted: ``` #6: <STRUCT> 'MyKey' sz:4 n:1 #00 '__0' off:0 --> [7] #7: <INT> 'u32' bits:32 off:0 #8: <PTR> --> [9] #9: <STRUCT> 'MyValue' sz:4 n:1 #00 '__0' off:0 --> [7] ``` Fixes: llvm#143361
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2025
The function already exposes a work list to avoid deep recursion, this commit starts utilizing it in a helper that could also lead to a deep recursion. We have observed this crash on `clang/test/C/C99/n590.c` with our internal builds that enable aggressive optimizations and hit the limit earlier than default release builds of Clang. See the added test for an example with a deeper recursion that used to crash in upstream Clang before this change with the following stack trace: ``` #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:0:3 #3 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3fdf0) #4 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12772:0 #5 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #6 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #7 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #8 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #9 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #10 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #11 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#12 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#13 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#14 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#15 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#16 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 llvm#17 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 llvm#18 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 llvm#19 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 ... 700+ more stack frames. ```
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2025
**Mitigation for:** google/sanitizers#749 **Disclosure:** I'm not an ASan compiler expert yet (I'm trying to learn!), I primarily work in the runtime. Some of this PR was developed with the help of AI tools (primarily as a "fuzzy `grep` engine"), but I've manually refined and tested the output, and can speak for every line. In general, I used it only to orient myself and for "rubberducking". **Context:** The msvc ASan team (👋 ) has received an internal request to improve clang's exception handling under ASan for Windows. Namely, we're interested in **mitigating** this bug: google/sanitizers#749 To summarize, today, clang + ASan produces a false-positive error for this program: ```C++ #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } ``` The error reads as such: ``` C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>type main.cpp #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>"C:\Users\dajusto\source\repos\llvm-project\build.runtimes\bin\clang.exe" -fsanitize=address -g -O0 main.cpp C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>a.exe ================================================================= ==19112==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: access-violation on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7ff72c7c11d9 bp 0x0080000ff960 sp 0x0080000fcf50 T0) ==19112==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==19112==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ff72c7c11d8 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 #1 0x7ff72c7d479f in _CallSettingFrame C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\amd64\handlers.asm:49 #2 0x7ff72c7c8944 in __FrameHandler3::CxxCallCatchBlock(struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD *) C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\frame.cpp:1567 #3 0x7ffb4a90e3e5 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18012e3e5) #4 0x7ff72c7c1128 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:6 #5 0x7ff72c7c33db in invoke_main C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:78 #6 0x7ff72c7c33db in __scrt_common_main_seh C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:288 #7 0x7ffb49b05c06 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180035c06) #8 0x7ffb4a8455ef (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800655ef) ==19112==Register values: rax = 0 rbx = 80000ff8e0 rcx = 27d76d00000 rdx = 80000ff8e0 rdi = 80000fdd50 rsi = 80000ff6a0 rbp = 80000ff960 rsp = 80000fcf50 r8 = 100 r9 = 19930520 r10 = 8000503a90 r11 = 80000fd540 r12 = 80000fd020 r13 = 0 r14 = 80000fdeb8 r15 = 0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: access-violation C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 in main ==19112==ABORTING ``` The root of the issue _appears to be_ that ASan's instrumentation is incompatible with Window's assumptions for instantiating `catch`-block's parameters (`ex` in the snippet above). The nitty gritty details are lost on me, but I understand that to make this work without loss of ASan coverage, a "serious" refactoring is needed. In the meantime, users risk false positive errors when pairing ASan + catch-block parameters on Windows. **To mitigate this** I think we should avoid instrumenting catch-block parameters on Windows. It appears to me this is as "simple" as marking catch block parameters as "uninteresting" in `AddressSanitizer::isInterestingAlloca`. My manual tests seem to confirm this. I believe this is strictly better than today's status quo, where the runtime generates false positives. Although we're now explicitly choosing to instrument less, the benefit is that now more programs can run with ASan without _funky_ macros that disable ASan on exception blocks. **This PR:** implements the mitigation above, and creates a simple new test for it. _Thanks!_ --------- Co-authored-by: Antonio Frighetto <me@antoniofrighetto.com>
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
…am (llvm#167724) This got exposed by `09262656f32ab3f2e1d82e5342ba37eecac52522`. The underlying stream of `m_os` is referenced by the `TextDiagnostic` member of `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. It got turned into a `llvm::formatted_raw_ostream` in the commit above. When `~TextDiagnosticPrinter` (and thus `~TextDiagnostic`) is invoked, we now call `~formatted_raw_ostream`, which tries to access the underlying stream. But `m_os` was already deleted because it is earlier in the order of destruction in `TextDiagnosticPrinter`. Move the `m_os` member before the `TextDiagnosticPrinter` to avoid a use-after-free. Drive-by: * Also move the `m_output` member which the `m_os` holds a reference to. The fact it's a reference indicates the expectation is most likely that the string outlives the stream. The ASAN macOS bot is currently failing with this: ``` 08:15:39 ================================================================= 08:15:39 ==61103==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60600012cf40 at pc 0x00012140d304 bp 0x00016eecc850 sp 0x00016eecc848 08:15:39 READ of size 8 at 0x60600012cf40 thread T0 08:15:39 #0 0x00012140d300 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::releaseStream() FormattedStream.h:205 08:15:39 #1 0x00012140d3a4 in llvm::formatted_raw_ostream::~formatted_raw_ostream() FormattedStream.h:145 08:15:39 #2 0x00012604abf8 in clang::TextDiagnostic::~TextDiagnostic() TextDiagnostic.cpp:721 08:15:39 #3 0x00012605dc80 in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:30 08:15:39 #4 0x00012605dd5c in clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter::~TextDiagnosticPrinter() TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:27 08:15:39 #5 0x0001231fb210 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 #6 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 #7 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91 08:15:39 #8 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103 08:15:39 #9 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 08:15:39 #10 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 ... 08:15:39 08:15:39 0x60600012cf40 is located 32 bytes inside of 56-byte region [0x60600012cf20,0x60600012cf58) 08:15:39 freed by thread T0 here: 08:15:39 #0 0x0001018abb88 in _ZdlPv+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4bb88) 08:15:39 #1 0x0001231fb1c0 in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 #2 0x0001231fb3bc in (anonymous namespace)::StoringDiagnosticConsumer::~StoringDiagnosticConsumer() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:47 08:15:39 #3 0x000129aa9d70 in clang::DiagnosticsEngine::~DiagnosticsEngine() Diagnostic.cpp:91 08:15:39 #4 0x0001230436b8 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::DiagnosticsEngine>::Release() const IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:103 08:15:39 #5 0x0001231fe6c8 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 08:15:39 #6 0x0001231fe858 in (anonymous namespace)::ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl::~ClangModulesDeclVendorImpl() ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:93 ... 08:15:39 08:15:39 previously allocated by thread T0 here: 08:15:39 #0 0x0001018ab760 in _Znwm+0x74 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x4b760) 08:15:39 #1 0x0001231f8dec in lldb_private::ClangModulesDeclVendor::Create(lldb_private::Target&) ClangModulesDeclVendor.cpp:732 08:15:39 #2 0x00012320af58 in lldb_private::ClangPersistentVariables::GetClangModulesDeclVendor() ClangPersistentVariables.cpp:124 08:15:39 #3 0x0001232111f0 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::PrepareForParsing(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:536 08:15:39 #4 0x000123213790 in lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse(lldb_private::DiagnosticManager&, lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::ExecutionPolicy, bool, bool) ClangUserExpression.cpp:647 08:15:39 #5 0x00012032b258 in lldb_private::UserExpression::Evaluate(lldb_private::ExecutionContext&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) UserExpression.cpp:280 08:15:39 #6 0x000120724010 in lldb_private::Target::EvaluateExpression(llvm::StringRef, lldb_private::ExecutionContextScope*, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ValueObject>&, lldb_private::EvaluateExpressionOptions const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*, lldb_private::ValueObject*) Target.cpp:2905 08:15:39 #7 0x00011fc7bde0 in lldb::SBTarget::EvaluateExpression(char const*, lldb::SBExpressionOptions const&) SBTarget.cpp:2305 08:15:39 ==61103==ABORTING ... ```
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2025
…lvm#168916) ## Problem Summary PyTorch's `test_warp_softmax_64bit_indexing` is failing with a numerical precision error where `log(1.1422761679)` computed with 54% higher error than expected (9.042e-09 vs 5.859e-09), causing gradient computations to exceed tolerance thresholds. This precision degradation was reproducible across all AMD GPU architectures (gfx1100, gfx1200, gfx90a, gfx950). I tracked down the problem to the commit **4703f8b6610a** (March 6, 2025) which changed HIP math headers to call `__builtin_logf()` directly instead of `__ocml_log_f32()`: ```diff - float logf(float __x) { return __FAST_OR_SLOW(__logf, __ocml_log_f32)(__x); } + float logf(float __x) { return __FAST_OR_SLOW(__logf, __builtin_logf)(__x); } ``` This change exposed a problem in the AMDGCN back-end as described below: ## Key Findings **1. Contract flag propagation:** When `-ffp-contract=fast` is enabled (default for HIP), Clang's CodeGen adds the `contract` flag to all `CallInst` instructions within the scope of `CGFPOptionsRAII`, including calls to LLVM intrinsics like `llvm.log.f32`. **2. Behavior change from OCML to builtin path:** - **Old path** (via `__ocml_log_f32`): The preprocessed IR showed the call to the OCML library function had the contract flag, but the OCML implementation internally dropped the contract flag when calling the `llvm.log.f32` intrinsic. ```llvm ; Function Attrs: alwaysinline convergent mustprogress nounwind define internal noundef float @_ZL4logff(float noundef %__x) #6 { entry: %retval = alloca float, align 4, addrspace(5) %__x.addr = alloca float, align 4, addrspace(5) %retval.ascast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %retval to ptr %__x.addr.ascast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %__x.addr to ptr store float %__x, ptr %__x.addr.ascast, align 4, !tbaa !23 %0 = load float, ptr %__x.addr.ascast, align 4, !tbaa !23 %call = call contract float @__ocml_log_f32(float noundef %0) llvm#23 ret float %call } ; Function Attrs: convergent mustprogress nofree norecurse nosync nounwind willreturn memory(none) define internal noundef float @__ocml_log_f32(float noundef %0) #7 { %2 = tail call float @llvm.log.f32(float %0) ret float %2 } ``` - **New path** (via `__builtin_logf`): The call goes directly to `llvm.log.f32` intrinsic with the contract flag preserved, causing the backend to apply FMA contraction during polynomial expansion. ```llvm ; Function Attrs: alwaysinline convergent mustprogress nounwind define internal noundef float @_ZL4logff(float noundef %__x) #6 { entry: %retval = alloca float, align 4, addrspace(5) %__x.addr = alloca float, align 4, addrspace(5) %retval.ascast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %retval to ptr %__x.addr.ascast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %__x.addr to ptr store float %__x, ptr %__x.addr.ascast, align 4, !tbaa !24 %0 = load float, ptr %__x.addr.ascast, align 4, !tbaa !24 %1 = call contract float @llvm.log.f32(float %0) ret float %1 } ``` **3. Why contract breaks log:** Our AMDGCM target back end implements the natural logarithm by taking the result of the hardware log, then multiplying that by `ln(2)`, and applying some rounding error correction to that multiplication. This results in something like: ```c r = y * c1; // y is result of v_log_ instruction, c1 = ln(2) r = r + fma(y, c2, fma(y, c1, -r)) // c2 is another error-correcting constant ``` ```asm v_log_f32_e32 v1, v1 s_mov_b32 s2, 0x3f317217 v_mul_f32_e32 v3, 0x3f317217, v1 v_fma_f32 v4, v1, s2, -v3 v_fmac_f32_e32 v4, 0x3377d1cf, v1 v_add_f32_e32 v3, v3, v4 ``` With the presence of the `contract` flag, the back-end fuses the add (`r + Z`) with the multiply thinking that it is legal, thus eliminating the intermediate rounding. The error compensation term, which was calculated based on the rounded product, is now being added to the full-precision result from the FMA, leading to incorrect error correction and degraded accuracy. The corresponding contracted operations become the following: ```c r = y * c1; r = fma(y, c1, fma(y, c2, fma(y, c1, -r))); ``` ```asm v_log_f32_e32 v1, v1 s_mov_b32 s2, 0x3f317217 v_mul_f32_e32 v3, 0x3f317217, v1 v_fma_f32 v3, v1, s2, -v3 v_fmac_f32_e32 v3, 0x3377d1cf, v1 v_fmac_f32_e32 v3, 0x3f317217, v1 ``` ## Solution and Proposed Fix Based on our implementation of `llvm.log` and `llvm.log10`, it should be illegal for the back-end to propagate the `contract` flag when it is present on the intrinsic call because it uses error-correcting summation. My proposed fix is to modify the instruction selection passes (both global-isel and sdag) to drop the `contract` flag when lowering llvm.log. That way, when the instruction selection performs the contraction optimization, it will not fuse the multiply and add. Note: I had originally implemented this fix in the FE by removing the `contract` flag when lowering the llvm.log builtin (PR llvm#168770). I have since closed that PR.
EricWF
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2025
…lvm#159480) When building rustc std for arm64e, core fails to compile successfully with the error: ``` Constant ValueID not recognized. UNREACHABLE executed at rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/FunctionComparator.cpp:523! ``` This is a result of function merging so I modified FunctionComparator.cpp as the ConstantPtrAuth value would go unchecked in the switch statement. The test case is a reduction from the failure in core and fails on main with: ``` ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll (59809 of 59995) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stdout): -- # RUN: at line 3 /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc < /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll | /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # executed command: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc # .---command stderr------------ # | Constant ValueID not recognized. # | UNREACHABLE executed at /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/FunctionComparator.cpp:523! # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace and instructions to reproduce the bug. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt -S -passes=mergefunc # | 1. Running pass "mergefunc" on module "<stdin>" # | #0 0x0000000103335770 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102651770) # | #1 0x00000001033336bc llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x10264f6bc) # | #2 0x0000000103336218 SignalHandler(int, __siginfo*, void*) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102652218) # | #3 0x000000018e6c16a4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1804ad6a4) # | #4 0x000000018e68788c (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x18047388c) # | #5 0x000000018e590a3c (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x18037ca3c) # | #6 0x00000001032a84bc llvm::install_out_of_memory_new_handler() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1025c44bc) # | #7 0x00000001033b37c0 llvm::FunctionComparator::cmpMDNode(llvm::MDNode const*, llvm::MDNode const*) const (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026cf7c0) # | #8 0x00000001033b4d90 llvm::FunctionComparator::cmpBasicBlocks(llvm::BasicBlock const*, llvm::BasicBlock const*) const (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026d0d90) # | #9 0x00000001033b5234 llvm::FunctionComparator::compare() (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x1026d1234) # | #10 0x0000000102d6d868 (anonymous namespace)::MergeFunctions::insert(llvm::Function*) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102089868) # | #11 0x0000000102d6bc0c llvm::MergeFunctionsPass::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102087c0c) # | llvm#12 0x0000000102d6b430 llvm::MergeFunctionsPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102087430) # | llvm#13 0x0000000102b90558 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x101eac558) # | llvm#14 0x0000000103734bc4 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::__1::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102a50bc4) # | llvm#15 0x000000010373cc28 optMain (/Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/opt+0x102a58c28) # | llvm#16 0x000000018e2e6b98 # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: -6 # executed command: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # .---command stderr------------ # | FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. # | FileCheck command line: /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck /Users/oskarwirga/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeFunc/ptrauth-const-compare.ll # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 2 ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.