Skip to content

Remove bodymap mapping mode from OTLP logs docs#6625

Open
felixbarny wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
otlp-remove-bodymap
Open

Remove bodymap mapping mode from OTLP logs docs#6625
felixbarny wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
otlp-remove-bodymap

Conversation

@felixbarny
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removes the "Body map mode for logs" section from the OTLP/HTTP endpoint docs.

The bodymap mapping mode is being removed from the ES OTLP logs endpoint in elastic/elasticsearch#149606. The mode allowed a log record's body map to be used as the complete ES document, bypassing the standard OTel structure. It's being dropped in favor of a future managed _bulk endpoint for non-OTel data.

The logs endpoint (including this mode) was only released as experimental on serverless and hasn't shipped in a stack release, so there's no migration concern.

The bodymap mapping mode is being removed from the ES OTLP logs endpoint (elastic/elasticsearch#149606).
@felixbarny felixbarny requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2026 14:13
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Elastic Docs AI PR menu

Check the box to run an AI review for this pull request.

  • Review docs changes (docs-review). Status: not started.

Powered by GitHub Agentic Workflows and docs-actions. For more information, reach out to the docs team.

@felixbarny felixbarny requested a review from axw May 21, 2026 14:14
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 21, 2026

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 21, 2026

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!


The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide.

To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants