Create a read only way of seeing if a specific route is blocked

[samoehlert]

Things we still need to do

• Clean up resulting output on the API
• Double check permissions
• Write tests where we add an IP then hit the url to see if it's blocked or not

[github-actions]

File	Coverage
All files	82%	✅
config/consumers.py	78%	✅
config/urls.py	69%	✅
config/settings/base.py	69%	✅
config/settings/local.py	72%	✅
scram/route_manager/admin.py	71%	✅
scram/route_manager/models.py	70%	✅
scram/route_manager/views.py	88%	✅
scram/route_manager/api/serializers.py	92%	✅
scram/route_manager/api/views.py	76%	✅
scram/shared/shared_code.py	56%	✅
scram/templates/403.html	91%	✅
scram/templates/404.html	91%	✅
scram/templates/base.html	99%	✅

Minimum allowed coverage is 50%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 011a99f

[samoehlert]

I didn't change anything with behave tests and it seems to be failing instead of ignoring failures on 3.13 like the config says. Not sure if you feel the need to make me figure that out before merging this.

  behave_next_python:
    name: Run Behave
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    continue-on-error: true
    strategy:
      max-parallel: 4
      matrix:
        python-version: ['3.13']```

[crankynetman]

Added a few comments inline. This works great for the exact use-case, but there are some edge cases that might be a bit confusing that I called out inline. I think we should fix the 500 due to submitting a subnet though just with a simple validation in the ViewSet itself if nothing else.

[crankynetman]

Looks great, I think we just have one more kink to figure out around cidrs. And the answer might be as simple as document it and add it later, but it does seem like an ugly rake to step on later.

[crankynetman]

Awesome work, nicely done!