Skip to content

Conversation

@Maidang1
Copy link
Contributor

@Maidang1 Maidang1 commented Apr 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced dynamic package detection for more flexible artifact management in releases.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined build commands and reorganized artifact upload steps for improved workflow clarity.
  • Chores

    • Added automation scripts and a pre-commit hook to ensure artifacts are consistently updated.
    • Updated project configurations and dependencies to enhance overall build and release reliability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several GitHub workflow definitions, adds a new pre-commit hook, and introduces TypeScript support for automating artifact updates. The changes include reformatting build commands, reorganizing artifact upload steps, dynamically generating package lists for release workflows, and adding a new script that scans plugin directories to update workflow files. No modifications were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yaml, .github/workflows/release-rust-plugins.yml Build Workflow: Reformatted build commands to an inline style, reorganized artifact upload steps (renamed, added, or removed steps), and cleaned up commented lines.
Release Workflow: Added a path filter for rust-plugins/** changes and a "Get Package List" step that dynamically generates package names.
.husky/pre-commit Added a new pre-commit hook that sources Husky's script, executes the artifact update command (pnpm run update-artifacts), and stages the updated workflow file for commit.
package.json, scripts/update-artifacts.ts, tsconfig.json Introduced a new update-artifacts script in package.json with corresponding new dependencies. Added a TypeScript script (update-artifacts.ts) to automate the update of upload steps in the build workflow by scanning the rust-plugins directory, along with a new TypeScript configuration file.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant PreCommit as Husky Pre-commit Hook
    participant Script as update-artifacts.ts
    participant FS as File System
    participant WF as Build Workflow File

    Dev->>PreCommit: Initiate commit
    PreCommit->>Script: Run "pnpm run update-artifacts"
    Script->>FS: Read directories in ./rust-plugins
    FS-->>Script: Return list of plugin directories
    Script->>WF: Read current .github/workflows/build.yaml
    Script->>WF: Remove outdated upload steps
    Script->>WF: Add new upload steps using generateUploadStep()
    Script->>FS: Write updated workflow content
    Script-->>PreCommit: Log processed plugin count
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Git as GitHub Push
    participant Runner as GitHub Actions Runner
    participant Workflow as Release Workflow
    participant Shell as Shell Executor

    Git->>Workflow: Push change to main with rust-plugins modifications
    Workflow->>Workflow: Trigger release job (path filter active)
    Workflow->>Shell: Execute "Get Package List" command
    Shell-->>Workflow: Return formatted list of package names
    Workflow->>Workflow: Iterate over packages in "Move Artifacts" step
Loading

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, hopping with delight,
For workflows and hooks now running just right.
Artifacts organized, commands neat and tight,
TypeScript and scripts shining so bright.
With each updated step, my heart feels so light.
🐰✨ Hop on, code friends – let's celebrate tonight!

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
.github/workflows/release-rust-plugins.yml (1)

31-36: Dynamic package discovery improves maintainability.

Using shell commands to automatically detect plugin directories is a good approach to eliminate hardcoding. However, the directory structure parsing is somewhat brittle.

Consider making the directory structure detection more robust:

- PACKAGES=$(ls -d ./rust-plugins/*/ | cut -d'/' -f3 | tr '\n' ' ')
+ PACKAGES=$(find ./rust-plugins -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type d -exec basename {} \; | tr '\n' ' ')
scripts/update-artifacts.ts (4)

1-3: Update Node.js module imports to use the newer protocol.

Current imports work but for newer Node.js versions, it's recommended to use the node: protocol for built-in modules.

- import * as fs from 'fs';
- import * as path from 'path';
+ import * as fs from 'node:fs';
+ import * as path from 'node:path';
  import * as yaml from 'yaml';
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 1-1: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.

Using the node: protocol is more explicit and signals that the imported module belongs to Node.js.
Unsafe fix: Add the node: protocol.

(lint/style/useNodejsImportProtocol)


[error] 2-2: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.

Using the node: protocol is more explicit and signals that the imported module belongs to Node.js.
Unsafe fix: Add the node: protocol.

(lint/style/useNodejsImportProtocol)


38-41: Consider using optional chaining instead of the && operator.

The current filtering logic works but can be simplified with optional chaining, and the TypeScript ignore comment could be avoided with proper typing.

- // @ts-ignore
- buildJob.steps = buildJob.steps.filter(step => 
-   !(step.name && step.name.startsWith('Upload Plugin '))
- );
+ // Define a type for the step
+ type WorkflowStep = {name?: string; [key: string]: any};
+ 
+ buildJob.steps = buildJob.steps.filter((step: WorkflowStep) => 
+   !step.name?.startsWith('Upload Plugin ')
+ );
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


44-46: Consider using for...of instead of forEach for better performance.

Using for...of loops can be more efficient than forEach for large arrays and improves readability.

- plugins.forEach(plugin => {
-   buildJob.steps.push(generateUploadStep(plugin));
- });
+ for (const plugin of plugins) {
+   buildJob.steps.push(generateUploadStep(plugin));
+ }
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 44-46: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)


20-52: Add error handling for file operations.

The script lacks error handling for file operations, which could make it more robust when dealing with file system operations.

Consider adding try/catch blocks:

function updateWorkflow() {
+ try {
    // Read the workflow file
    const workflowPath = path.join(process.cwd(), WORKFLOW_FILE);
    const workflowContent = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
    const workflow = yaml.parse(workflowContent);

    // Get all rust plugin directories
    const pluginsPath = path.join(process.cwd(), RUST_PLUGINS_DIR);
    const plugins = fs.readdirSync(pluginsPath)
      .filter(name => fs.statSync(path.join(pluginsPath, name)).isDirectory());

    // Find the build job
    const buildJob = workflow.jobs.build;
    if (!buildJob) {
      throw new Error('Could not find build job in workflow file');
    }

    // Rest of the function...

    // Write back to file
    fs.writeFileSync(workflowPath, yaml.stringify(workflow));
    
    console.log(`Updated workflow file with ${plugins.length} plugins`);
+ } catch (error) {
+   console.error('Error updating workflow file:', error);
+   process.exit(1);
+ }
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


[error] 44-46: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)

package.json (1)

9-10: New Script Additions in the "scripts" Section.
The addition of the "commit": "git cz" and "update-artifacts": "ts-node scripts/update-artifacts.ts" scripts enhances your commit workflow and automates artifact updates. Please verify that the pre-commit hook (referencing pnpm run update-artifacts) is correctly integrated into your Husky configuration.

.github/workflows/build.yaml (3)

14-20: Updated Build Command for linux-x64-gnu.
The inline build command has been reformatted into a multi-line shell command. Please double-check that the sequence—setting the safe directory, unsetting environment variables, disabling corepack, installing pnpm, and invoking the build with the filter—is executed as intended in your CI environment. If the command grows more complex, consider refactoring this logic into an external script for maintainability.


97-99: Updated Docker Options for the Build in Docker Step.
The updated Docker options now include volume mounts for the Cargo cache and workspace. Please verify that these volume mappings correctly point to the intended directories in your GitHub Actions environment and that there are no unexpected side effects.


103-107: Dynamic Default Build Command with Conditional Targeting.
The Default Build step constructs its command dynamically based on the matrix settings. Ensure that the conditional concatenation (using format and inline conditionals) behaves as expected for different configurations. Adding inline comments or documentation here might help future maintainers understand the logic.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7805365 and c4d984a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release-rust-plugins.yml (3 hunks)
  • .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • scripts/update-artifacts.ts (1 hunks)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
scripts/update-artifacts.ts

[error] 1-1: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.

Using the node: protocol is more explicit and signals that the imported module belongs to Node.js.
Unsafe fix: Add the node: protocol.

(lint/style/useNodejsImportProtocol)


[error] 2-2: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.

Using the node: protocol is more explicit and signals that the imported module belongs to Node.js.
Unsafe fix: Add the node: protocol.

(lint/style/useNodejsImportProtocol)


[error] 40-40: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


[error] 44-46: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
tsconfig.json (1)

1-10: Well-structured TypeScript configuration.

This is a standard and appropriate TypeScript configuration for a Node.js environment with good defaults:

  • ES2018 target is suitable for modern Node.js
  • Strict type checking enabled for improved code quality
  • CommonJS module system for Node.js compatibility
  • Essential flags for better developer experience
.husky/pre-commit (1)

1-5: Good automation with pre-commit hook.

This pre-commit hook ensures that workflow files are automatically updated and staged before each commit, maintaining consistency in the CI/CD configuration.

.github/workflows/release-rust-plugins.yml (2)

6-7: Appropriate path filter addition.

Adding path filters to only trigger the workflow when files in the rust-plugins directory are modified is a good optimization.


46-46: Dynamic package iteration.

Using the dynamically generated package list in the loop is a good improvement over hardcoded values.

scripts/update-artifacts.ts (1)

8-18: Well-structured upload step generation function.

The generateUploadStep function creates a properly configured artifact upload step with appropriate parameters and the if-no-files-found: 'ignore' option is a good choice to handle missing artifacts gracefully.

package.json (1)

18-25: New DevDependencies for TypeScript Support.
The newly added devDependencies (@types/node, ts-node, typescript, and yaml) align well with the introduction of the artifact update script. Ensure that the specified versions are compatible with your project setup and that your team is aware of the new TypeScript-based tooling.

.github/workflows/build.yaml (5)

24-27: Reformatted Build Command for linux-x64-musl.
Similar to the linux-x64-gnu configuration, the build command here uses multi-line formatting. Verify that unsetting the environment variable (CC_x86_64_unknown_linux_musl) and the subsequent pnpm invocation operate reliably across your build agents.


37-44: Windows Build Command for win32-ia32-msvc.
The usage of a folded scalar (>) improves readability for the Windows build command. Please ensure that the exported environment variables and the sequence of installing cargo-xwin and invoking pnpm work as expected on the targeted Windows environment.


48-57: Windows Build Command for win32-arm64-msvc.
This build command also uses a folded scalar to maintain clarity. Double-check that the exports (like setting CARGO_PROFILE_RELEASE_CODEGEN_UNITS and CARGO_PROFILE_RELEASE_LTO) and the subsequent commands, including the installation of cargo-xwin, execute correctly for the arm64 target.


90-91: Explicit Zig Version Specification.
Specifying Zig version 0.13.0 in the setup step is clear and helps ensure consistency. Confirm that this version meets your project’s requirements and works harmoniously with your build process.


113-202:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Artifact Upload Steps Review and Consistency Check.
The workflow now includes a comprehensive set of artifact upload steps for various Rust plugins. Notably, the new "Upload Plugin yaml" step has been added (lines 197–202) to handle YAML artifacts, which is in line with the updated automation. However, according to the AI summary, the "Upload Plugin mdx" (lines 143–148) and "Upload Plugin modular-import" (lines 149–154) steps were expected to be removed and replaced by this new step. Since both sets of steps still exist, please confirm whether the mdx and modular-import steps are still required or if they should be removed to avoid redundancy and maintain consistency with your planned workflow improvements.


Artifact Upload Steps Consistency: Clarification Needed

The workflow now includes both the legacy "Upload Plugin mdx" (lines 143–148) and "Upload Plugin modular-import" (lines 149–154) steps, alongside the new "Upload Plugin yaml" (lines 197–202) step. Previously, the mdx and modular-import steps were expected to be removed in favor of the streamlined YAML upload. Please confirm if these mdx and modular-import steps are still required or if they should be removed to avoid redundancy and maintain consistency with the planned workflow improvements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants