Skip to content

docs: update mkdocs content for yeti#207

Open
frostyardyeti[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
yeti/mkdocs-update-20260331-c9a5
Open

docs: update mkdocs content for yeti#207
frostyardyeti[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
yeti/mkdocs-update-20260331-c9a5

Conversation

@frostyardyeti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@frostyardyeti frostyardyeti bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Summary

Updates the issue-refiner job documentation to reflect recent prompt improvements that make implementation plans more rigorous and grounded in actual code. These changes document stronger guardrails around phantom references, scope discipline, step-by-step buildability, and a fifth self-critique dimension (completeness vs. gold-plating).

Changes

  • Phantom detection: Documented that Claude now flags functions, types, APIs, or file paths that don't exist in the codebase rather than planning around them
  • File path verification: Plans must only reference files that were actually opened and confirmed to exist
  • Step buildability: Each implementation step must leave the project in a buildable, test-passing state
  • Expanded risk coverage: Risks section now explicitly includes concurrency, error paths, and boundary conditions
  • Testing patterns: Plans must follow the repo's existing test framework, mock style, and fixture conventions
  • Scope guardrails: Added explicit "What NOT to plan" guidance — no unnecessary logging, README updates, impossible-scenario validation, or adjacent code cleanup
  • Fifth self-critique dimension: Added "completeness vs. gold-plating" to the structured self-critique, ensuring plans solve the full issue without over-solving

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant