Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 83117028ba
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Commit Messages and PR Titles | ||
|
|
||
| No prefixes (`feat:`, `fix:`, `[codex]`, etc.). Start with capital letter, imperative mood, include GitHub issue number. Example: `Add job count for locales #123`. PR titles follow the same rules. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace GitHub issue requirement with beads issue IDs
This new rule conflicts with the earlier project guidance that issue tracking is done in br (beads_rust) (AGENTS.md lines 5–16), so requiring a “GitHub issue number” will push contributors to add unrelated or fabricated #123 references and break traceability to actual beads tickets. Please update this sentence to require the project’s real issue identifier format instead of GitHub issue numbers.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
/fast-forward |
Summary
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code