Skip to content

Introduce exe.dev hosting#1257

Open
PonomareVlad wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
hosting/exe-dev
Open

Introduce exe.dev hosting#1257
PonomareVlad wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
hosting/exe-dev

Conversation

@PonomareVlad
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This pull request adds documentation for hosting grammY bots on exe.dev and integrates exe.dev as a recommended hosting provider throughout the site. The main changes include a new tutorial, an update to the hosting comparison table, and a navigation menu addition.

Documentation and Content Additions:

  • Added a new tutorial file site/docs/hosting/exe.md with step-by-step instructions for deploying grammY bots on exe.dev, including Shelley prompt examples for both long polling and webhooks, as well as information about custom domains.
  • Updated the hosting comparison table in site/docs/hosting/comparison.md to include exe.dev, detailing its pricing, specs, and location.

Navigation Updates:

  • Added exe.dev as an option in the hosting tutorials navigation menu in site/docs/.vitepress/configs/locales/en.ts.

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Feb 11, 2026

@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to pull request February 11, 2026 02:19 Inactive
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to pull request February 11, 2026 02:32 Inactive
@PonomareVlad PonomareVlad marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2026 02:32
@KnorpelSenf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It's pretty irresponsible to host a service without understanding anything about it. I have yet to decide if we should encourage this, I'll get back to you

@PonomareVlad
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It's pretty irresponsible to host a service without understanding anything about it.

Primary, guys from Tailscale 🌚

@KnorpelSenf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A lot of money can be made this way, don't get me wrong. Their incentives are clear. It's just that ... deploying code you don't understand is already bad, but deploying it onto infra you don't understand is outright negligient.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@KnorpelSenf KnorpelSenf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you alter the instructions to describe how to deploy to exe.dev manually? We can include a warning box near the end of the page which mentions that an idgaf-deployment via LLMs exists, and when people should/shouldn't use it.

@PonomareVlad PonomareVlad self-assigned this Feb 18, 2026
@KnorpelSenf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@PonomareVlad pleasea resolve the conflicts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants