Bump version to 0.22.4 and generate client code from updated spec#337
Merged
CoreyEWood merged 3 commits intomainfrom Apr 1, 2025
Merged
Bump version to 0.22.4 and generate client code from updated spec#337CoreyEWood merged 3 commits intomainfrom
CoreyEWood merged 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
CoreyEWood
commented
Mar 31, 2025
| ] | ||
| readme = "README.md" | ||
| version = "0.22.3" | ||
| version = "0.22.4" |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's fine to bump the version here rather than in a separate PR? Let me know if that's not true though.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's fine to do here, we only bump it in a separate PR sometimes due to forgetting to put it in earlier :)
CoreyEWood
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bump version to 0.22.4.
This updates the spec to the point of #4798, to avoid removing the
Labelenum (which may cause issues, I'm not sure).Spec changes include (as far as I can tell):
report-metricsendpointfrom_edgefield on results