Skip to content

Run CI on a big-endian system#1180

Open
meooow25 wants to merge 35 commits intohaskell:masterfrom
meooow25:more-arch-ci
Open

Run CI on a big-endian system#1180
meooow25 wants to merge 35 commits intohaskell:masterfrom
meooow25:more-arch-ci

Conversation

@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@treeowl
Copy link
Contributor

treeowl commented Feb 15, 2026

How did you write/generate this? How can someone else update it? It would be good to record this info in the repo.

@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor Author

meooow25 commented Feb 15, 2026

I just wanted to try using https://github.com/uraimo/run-on-arch-action

Still trying to get it to work.

Edit: Well, it worked but took almost 3 hours...

@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor Author

meooow25 commented Feb 22, 2026

The caching of the install part seems to not be working. The error message is

error from registry: installation not allowed to Create organization package

I can see that it works fine for text and bytestring, e.g. https://github.com/haskell/bytestring/packages

It might be something to do with workflow permissions for this repository which I don't have access to. @treeowl maybe you can do something about this?

Edit: Maybe it needs to run from the master branch to have permissions create the package. In that case we can merge this and see if it works.

@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anyway, I've managed to get the running time down from 171m to 54m. Any ideas to improve it further are welcome.

I can see that text and bytestring avoid using cabal (like this). I don't know if that is faster, but I don't want to go that far.

@treeowl
Copy link
Contributor

treeowl commented Feb 23, 2026

I just saw your last couple comments. I've upgraded you to a "maintainer" role, so you should now have all the powers I do. You may have to merge to get things kicked off; I'm not sure.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where does all this come from, and what maintenance will it need? I still don't see documentation on that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what you wish to be documented. It's configuration for a GitHub Action.

@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor Author

meooow25 commented Mar 1, 2026

I just saw your last couple comments. I've upgraded you to a "maintainer" role, so you should now have all the powers I do. You may have to merge to get things kicked off; I'm not sure.

Thanks! But I still don't see anything about workflow permissions in the setting. Let's see if it works after it's merged...

@meooow25 meooow25 marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2026 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants