fix: remove conditional formatting for liaison bodies

[ghost]

fixes #10129

[rjsparks]

Simple code fix, but it's going to need a companion data fix, or at least an inspection to verify that the effect on the display of the existing statements is acceptable.

The entire liaison app is up for reimplementation (that effort is in a design phase that will accelerate after we deploy the rpc modernrization work). It would be best to check whether changes in that app are likely to just be replaced soon anyhow.

Rather than do the data display inspection now, lets hold it for the reimplementation.

[ghost]

Simple code fix, but it's going to need a companion data fix, or at least an inspection to verify that the effect on the display of the existing statements is acceptable.

The entire liaison app is up for reimplementation (that effort is in a design phase that will accelerate after we deploy the rpc modernrization work). It would be best to check whether changes in that app are likely to just be replaced soon anyhow.

Rather than do the data display inspection now, lets hold it for the reimplementation.

okk, happy to try the markdown preview option. just simple fix as i was editing the template

[rjsparks]

Just in case - I think I'm still not shining the light on what I am trying to point out. This last line from the issue:

Either will require an effort to adjust existing bodies to display correctly after the change.

It's the existing data that will have to be inspected and possibly reconditioned when we make this change, not newly entered statements.

And again, this has really become input into the requirements for the re-implementation rather than requirements for point fixes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.36%. Comparing base (4945809) to head (981196d).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10411   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.36%   88.36%           
=======================================
  Files         325      325           
  Lines       43653    43653           
=======================================
  Hits        38573    38573           
  Misses       5080     5080           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.