Skip to content

Conversation

@thoniTUB
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.


WriteFuture sendFailure = worker.send(failMessage);
sendFailure.addListener(failWriteFuture -> {
if (((WriteFuture)failWriteFuture).isWritten()) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yo dawg

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Der Listener wird leider noch nicht ausgeführt wenn der OOM kommt 😢

@thoniTUB thoniTUB requested a review from awildturtok January 20, 2026 10:38
Comment on lines +62 to 66
if (worker.getQueryExecutor().isCancelled(getExecutionId())) {
// Query is done so we no longer need the cancellation entry.
worker.getQueryExecutor().unsetQueryCancelled(getQueryId());
worker.getQueryExecutor().unsetQueryCancelled(getExecutionId());
return;
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@awildturtok Ich glaube das gehört hier eigentlich nicht mehr hin. Der Cancel-Status wird ganz zu anfang in der ExecuteQuery einmal aufgehoben

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ich meine, das war einfach nur um das set zu clearen, dass es nicht unnötig wächst.

Comment on lines +62 to 66
if (worker.getQueryExecutor().isCancelled(getExecutionId())) {
// Query is done so we no longer need the cancellation entry.
worker.getQueryExecutor().unsetQueryCancelled(getQueryId());
worker.getQueryExecutor().unsetQueryCancelled(getExecutionId());
return;
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ich meine, das war einfach nur um das set zu clearen, dass es nicht unnötig wächst.

Co-authored-by: awildturtok <1553491+awildturtok@users.noreply.github.com>
@thoniTUB thoniTUB merged commit 047b6c9 into develop Jan 20, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants