✨ Add unpacking and piping for optional and_then#266
Merged
elbeno merged 1 commit intointel:mainfrom Aug 15, 2025
Merged
Conversation
elbeno
force-pushed
the
optional-transform-unwrap
branch
from
d1ae674 to
e6140eb
Compare
Problem: - It's awkward to continually unpack tuples when calling `optional` ... `transform` ... `and_then` chains. - It's wordy to express `and_then` chains, when the pipe operator is a conventional way to express monadic bind. Solution: - Add automatic tuple unpacking. - Add pipe syntax for `and_then` chains.
elbeno
force-pushed
the
optional-transform-unwrap
branch
from
e6140eb to
1719938
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem:
optional...transform...and_thenchains.and_thenchains, when the pipe operator is a conventional way to express monadic bind.Solution:
and_thenchains.