Open
Conversation
here is a draft for a VEP (vocabulary enhanced proposal) to be discussed and refined and submitted to the semantics group for approval.
|
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 09:16:44AM -0800, Mireille LOUYS wrote:
here is a draft for a VEP (vocabulary enhanced proposal) to be discussed and refined and submitted to the semantics group for approval.
see comment in issue #5
Oh, this is a new vocabulary, so you wouldn't do a VEP, which is Sect
5.2 of VocInVO2 ("Updating Vocabularies"). What applies here is
VocInVO2, Sect 5.1.
<https://ivoa.net/documents/Vocabularies/20230206/REC-Vocabularies-2.1.html#tth_sEcA.1>
("New Vocabularies").
That is, you write the vocabulary (ideally as a CSV as per
<https://ivoa.net/documents/Vocabularies/20230206/REC-Vocabularies-2.1.html#tth_sEcA.1>,
but we can help you with that) and submit that to the semantics WG.
The review happens as part of the review of the embedding document,
so the vocabulary would become non-preliminary when your document
reaches REC or EN.
Thanks,
Markus
|
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
||
| Used-in: CTA example? |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Used-in: CTA example? | |
| Used-in: For HE, VHE and UHE instruments, the PSF permits to analyse the event list to extract spectrum from an ON region (called `1D analysis`) or to adjust a spectral, spatial, temporal model of a source from an extended field of view. |
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
| Description: A dataset that records the “effective area” of a telescope | ||
| and/or instrument. The effective area is the geometric area | ||
| of the telescope and/or instrument reduced by efficiency factors | ||
| such as reflectivity and vignetting, among other effects |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| such as reflectivity and vignetting, among other effects | |
| such as reflectivity and vignetting, analysis efficiency, among other effects |
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
| measures residual non-gamma-ray events coming. | ||
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Used-in: For VHE gamma-ray instrument, it measures the residual cosmic-ray event rate. | |
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
| Label: bkgrate | ||
| Description: A dataset that models the rate of residual events that are | ||
| not from the expected source type (e.g. for gamma-ray instrument it | ||
| measures residual non-gamma-ray events coming. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| measures residual non-gamma-ray events coming. | |
| not from the expected source type. This rate is about mis-reconstructed events that are badly identified as event. It should be distingued from low level instrumental background, such that an electronic noise. |
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
| Action: Addition | ||
| Label: edisp | ||
| Description: A dataset that records the | ||
| probability density of detecting an event with an energy estimator given the true |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| probability density of detecting an event with an energy estimator given the true | |
| probability density function of detecting an event at an energy-proxy estimation given the true |
bkhelifi
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
||
| Used-in: HESS data products ? |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Used-in: HESS data products ? | |
| Used-in: For HE, VHE and UHE instruments, `edisp` permits to analyse the event list to extract spectrum from an ON region (called `1D analysis`) or to adjust a spectral, spatial, temporal model of a source from an extended field of view. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
here is a draft for a VEP (vocabulary enhanced proposal) to be discussed and refined and submitted to the semantics group for approval.
see comment in issue #5