Update documentation and examples for pool.terminate.#57
Open
mramato wants to merge 1 commit intojosdejong:masterfrom
Open
Update documentation and examples for pool.terminate.#57mramato wants to merge 1 commit intojosdejong:masterfrom
mramato wants to merge 1 commit intojosdejong:masterfrom
Conversation
`pool.terminuate` returns a Promise, but the documentation and examples treated it as if it were synchronous. Fixes josdejong#56
stefanpenner
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2019
Owner
|
Before merging this PR, I think we first have to actually implement the async termination, we discovered that's not yet the case 🙄 , see #32 |
maybephilipp
pushed a commit
to maybephilipp/workerpool
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2020
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Gerasimov <starostin13@outlook.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pool.terminatereturns a Promise, but the documentation and examples treated it as if it were synchronous.Fixes #56