Skip to content

refactor(readiness-condition-reporter): swap context.TODO() for content.Background()#239

Open
LightCreator1007 wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
LightCreator1007:hygiene-readiness-controller-reporter-tests
Open

refactor(readiness-condition-reporter): swap context.TODO() for content.Background()#239
LightCreator1007 wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
LightCreator1007:hygiene-readiness-controller-reporter-tests

Conversation

@LightCreator1007
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This PR replaces the usage of context.TODO() with context.Background() in cmd/readiness-condition-reporter/main_test.go.
This change cleans up the codebase and enforces Go's best practices. It does not alter any existing application logic or data flows.

Related Issue

None

Type of Change

/kind cleanup

Testing

  • Verified that the change is isolated entirely to the test suite (main_test.go).
  • Ran local unit tests to ensure TestCheckHealth, TestCheckHealthCancelledContext, and TestUpdateNodeCondition continue to pass successfully with the updated context.

Checklist

  • make test passes
  • make lint passes

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label May 10, 2026
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented May 10, 2026

Deploy Preview for node-readiness-controller canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 94ca92d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/node-readiness-controller/deploys/6a00f54f06d037000807a3fb

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 10, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Welcome @LightCreator1007!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/node-readiness-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/node-readiness-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 10, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @LightCreator1007. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 10, 2026
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 11, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR
LGTM

@ajaysundark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ajaysundark, LightCreator1007

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants