Skip to content

Conversation

@sneaky-potato
Copy link

Fixes #183

Signed-off-by: Ashwani Kumar Kamal <ashwanikamal.im421@gmail.com>

The lifetime of an object is not tied solely to Lua garbage collection. An object remains alive as long as at least one reference exists.

Some objects expose an explicit *stop* or *close* operation, which releases internal resources (such as Lua states or kernel hooks) before the object itself is freed.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Lua states" seems misleading here.. see https://www.lua.org/manual/5.4/manual.html#lua_State


Lua garbage collection may release Lua references to an object, but this does not necessarily destroy the underlying kernel object. Garbage collection typically results in a reference counter decrement.

Kernel-held references keep the object alive even after all Lua references are gone. For deterministic cleanup, objects should be explicitly stopped or unloaded when appropriate.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you give an example?

Lunatik exposes kernel facilities to Lua through *objects*. A Lunatik object is a Lua userdata that represents a kernel-resident resource and is shared between Lua and C code.

Internally, each Lunatik object combines:
- a Lua userdata
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

per runtime, right? each object might correspond to many userdata.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add documentation for Lunatik objects

2 participants