Add footnote about actor/keyId resolution during HTTP Signature processing #1840
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Requesting an additional review from @oneiros or @ClearlyClaire just to double-check here, thanks. |
mjankowski
force-pushed
the
journey-of-keyid-and-actor-fragment-vs-whole-hog
branch
from
0cc1bc3 to
656b99f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #1431
This page was actually improved quite a bit since the original issue, but I think the nuance around this one detail is still missing. This is essentially a verbatim copy/paste from the issue into what I think is a relevant portion of the spec description/guide.
I contemplated whether this was most appropriate on this security page or the AP spec page, and opted for here. Don't feel strongly though, could move.