Skip to content

Conversation

@lpatiny
Copy link
Member

@lpatiny lpatiny commented Sep 15, 2025

No description provided.

@lpatiny lpatiny linked an issue Sep 15, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@lpatiny lpatiny enabled auto-merge (rebase) September 15, 2025 11:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (65d1c36) to head (48174d1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #330      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.66%   96.67%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines        5935     5928       -7     
  Branches     1307     1304       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         5737     5731       -6     
+ Misses        198      197       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@lpatiny lpatiny merged commit f67fc08 into main Sep 15, 2025
10 checks passed
@lpatiny lpatiny deleted the 328-why-is-there-a-notion-of-monoisotopic-in-this-project branch September 15, 2025 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why is there a notion of "monoisotopic" in this project?

2 participants