OpenLink MCP server additions

[kidehen]

Description

Added the OpenLink generic MCP servers for the following to the Community Servers collection, integrated in alphabetical order.

Moved new additions to the Community section and ordered alphabetically.

Server Details

• Generic MCP Server for ODBC (https://github.com/OpenLinkSoftware/mcp-odbc-server)
• Generic MCP Server for JDBC (https://github.com/OpenLinkSoftware/mcp-jdbc-server)
• Generic MCP Server of pyODBC (https://github.com/OpenLinkSoftware/mcp-pyodbc-server)
• Generic MCP Server for SQLAlchemy (https://github.com/OpenLinkSoftware/mcp-odbc-server)
• MCP server for ADO.NET (https://github.com/OpenLinkSoftware/mcp-adonet-server/)

Motivation and Context

List enrichment.

How Has This Been Tested?

Via our normal product QA and release process across all major DBMS platforms that we support e.g.. Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server / Sybase, Informix, Progress 4GL / OpenEdge, DB2, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. This also includes our ODBC to JDBC and JDBC to ODBC bridges.

Breaking Changes

This is simply a list addition. Existing users of these MCP servers will not need to change anything.

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [X ] Documentation update

Checklist

• I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
• My changes follows MCP security best practices
• I have updated the server's README accordingly
• I have tested this with an LLM client
• My code follows the repository's style guidelines
• New and existing tests pass locally
• I have added appropriate error handling
• I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

[olaservo]

Hi, thanks for the PR. Could you remove the other unrelated changes? Thanks!

[kidehen]

This approach isn't going to work, since by the time you get to review my PR the sorting order would have changed. How do I simply make a submission of our MCP servers for you to incorporate?

[olaservo]

Hi @kidehen, we've been experimenting with bypassing the need to sort and alphabetize in each PR by aggregating multiple additions like this one: #2370 (Doing it one by one was leading to more chances for conflicts, etc.)

We hadn't updated the PR template yet since we were still refining the process and seeing some PRs getting missed, but we will clarify that in the template for future PRs. Thanks!

[kidehen]

Hi @kidehen, we've been experimenting with bypassing the need to sort and alphabetize in each PR by aggregating multiple additions like this one: #2370 (Doing it one by one was leading to more chances for conflicts, etc.)

We hadn't updated the PR template yet since we were still refining the process and seeing some PRs getting missed, but we will clarify that in the template for future PRs. Thanks!

Okay, thanks for the reply. At this juncture, what's the best cause of action for adding our MCP servers?

[TallTed]

@kidehen @olaservo — I think all merge conflicts are resolved and this is ready to merge into https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/tree/main.

Please let me know if there are remaining issues.

[olaservo]

Thanks for your contribution to the servers list. This has been merged in this combined PR: #2475

This is a new process we're trying out, so if you see any issues feel free to re-open the PR and tag me.