Skip to content

Proof of Concept: v2 monorepo, package split #1279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
KKonstantinov wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Proof of Concept: v2 monorepo, package split #1279

KKonstantinov wants to merge 6 commits into from
+50,155 −7

Conversation

@KKonstantinov
Copy link
Contributor

@KKonstantinov KKonstantinov commented Dec 10, 2025

Proof of Concept: v2 monorepo, package split

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1279

commit: ebeacac

@KKonstantinov KKonstantinov added the v2 Ideas, requests and plans for v2 of the SDK which will incorporate major changes and fixes label Dec 10, 2025
@KKonstantinov KKonstantinov self-assigned this Dec 10, 2025
felixweinberger
felixweinberger reviewed Dec 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@felixweinberger felixweinberger left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a way we can break this PR up somehow so that this is more reviewable? E.g. with using git mv to preserve history and provenance of files? As it is it'll be quite hard to verify correctness of the split.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@felixweinberger felixweinberger felixweinberger left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@KKonstantinov KKonstantinov

Labels

v2 Ideas, requests and plans for v2 of the SDK which will incorporate major changes and fixes

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@KKonstantinov @felixweinberger