Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This submission removes several @ts-expect-error comments and improves the overall type safety of the codebase by fixing the underlying type issues in src/utils/shell.ts and src/utils/dot-env.ts.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 12215694966020416008 started by @serhalp

Removes `@ts-expect-error` suppressions in `src/utils/shell.ts` and `src/utils/dot-env.ts` by introducing proper type guards and explicit types.

- In `shell.ts`, adds a type assertion to correctly handle the `execa` result when `reject: false` is used.
- In `dot-env.ts`, adds explicit types to function parameters and uses a type predicate with `.filter()` to correctly narrow array types. This also resolves downstream type errors in `dev.ts`.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Benchmark results

Comparing with ee56a9e

  • Dependency count: 1,052 (no change)
  • Package size: 317 MB (no change)
  • Number of ts-expect-error directives: 359 ⬇️ 1.95% decrease vs. ee56a9e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant