Skip to content

chore: release 0.9.0#811

Merged
toddbaert merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--operator
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

chore: release 0.9.0#811
toddbaert merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--operator

Conversation

@openfeaturebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot commented Mar 21, 2026

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

0.9.0 (2026-04-16)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • CLUSTER_DOMAIN env var is now FLAGD_CLUSTER_DOMAIN.

✨ New Features

  • add flag metadata to FeatureFlag CRD (#808) (33168bb)
  • add latest flagd config fields, bump deps (#818) (bf6c1ec)
  • rename api module name (apis -> api) (#823) (70e9a3b)

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • correct capabilities drop value to "ALL" for PodSecurity restricted compliance (#804) (0c87d05)
  • envconfig: rename CLUSTER_DOMAIN env var to FLAGD_CLUSTER_DOMAIN (#792) (0668bd6)
  • rename CLUSTER_DOMAIN env var to FLAGD_CLUSTER_DOMAIN (3cf6a6a)
  • security: pin all GitHub Actions to SHA digests (#810) (9cd944a)
  • Set appProtocol for service resources (#797) (fd99ee5)

🧹 Chore


This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request automates the release of version 0.8.10 of the OpenFeature Operator. The primary change included in this release is a security enhancement that pins all GitHub Actions to their specific SHA digests, improving the integrity and security of the CI/CD pipeline. Additionally, this PR updates all relevant version references across the project's configuration and documentation to reflect the new release.

Highlights

  • New Release: Version 0.8.10 of the OpenFeature Operator has been released.
  • Security Fix: All GitHub Actions have been pinned to specific SHA digests to enhance security.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request appears to be an automated release for version 0.8.10. The version numbers have been updated correctly across all relevant files. However, there is an issue with the release date in the CHANGELOG.md file, which is set to a future date. This should be corrected before the release is finalized.

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
# Changelog

## [0.8.10](https://github.com/open-feature/open-feature-operator/compare/v0.8.9...v0.8.10) (2026-03-21)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The release date is set to a future date (2026-03-21). This is likely a typo and should be corrected to the current date. This seems to be a recurring issue, as the previous release also has a future date, which might indicate a misconfiguration in the release automation tool.

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--operator branch from 82c39f3 to 6db1733 Compare March 21, 2026 14:20
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--operator branch 5 times, most recently from 5f9d4a4 to c35a45c Compare April 10, 2026 20:02
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot changed the title chore: release 0.8.10 chore: release 0.9.0 Apr 10, 2026
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--operator branch 6 times, most recently from aeb1ce2 to af0cbab Compare April 13, 2026 20:59
Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <109696520+openfeaturebot@users.noreply.github.com>
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--operator branch from af0cbab to 67b7abc Compare April 16, 2026 19:15
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit d758462 into main Apr 17, 2026
14 of 17 checks passed
@openfeaturebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--operator branch April 17, 2026 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants