-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Dockerfile: add or document an alpine setup #169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
I saw there was a little interest on this: #8 It seems convenient to have also alpine based images to reduce the size of imagebuilders and sdks, eg: and for faster pulls from registries. Maybe the list of requirements installed by |
|
fix: move docker args and envs after the installation of system requirements. |
|
@ynezz what do you think? |
|
fix: set default distros when no input from workflow dispatch is provided |
aparcar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your work, some minor changes please
|
Thanks for reviewing. Submitted the requested changes. |
Signed-off-by: Samuele Longhi <agave@dracaena.it>
|
fd93873 adds the missing path to Dockerfile also to the step Push. I loaded some images based on alpine at https://hub.docker.com/r/agave0/openwrt-imagebuilder |
document an alpine setup to self build smaller imagebuilder containers