-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 524
docs: document passkey advanced configuration options #2519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jhickmanit
wants to merge
4
commits into
ory:master
Choose a base branch
from
jhickmanit:jhickmanit/passkey-options-docs
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+59
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4536462
docs(kratos): document passkey advanced configuration options
jhickmanit 9a98779
docs: update passkey options to match final Kratos API
jhickmanit 7e273fe
docs: prettier
jhickmanit e17e24e
docs: drop passkey attestation.policy section
jhickmanit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
In Docusaurus MDX Tabs (@theme/Tabsand@theme/TabItem), is it valid to mark more than oneTabItemasdefault? If multiple are marked, which one is selected?💡 Result:
If you mark more than one with the default prop inside a Docusaurus , it is not treated as a set of multiple defaults. Only one tab value is selected. Which one is selected: the first TabItem (in document order) whose TabItem/default=true is found. Reasoning (based on Docusaurus implementation): Tabs computes the initial selected value by scanning tabValues and using tabValues.find((tabValue) => tabValue.default) (falling back to the first tab if none are marked). Array.find returns the first matching element, so if multiple TabItems have default, the earliest one in the rendered children list wins. If none are marked default, the first tab is shown.
Citations:
Remove the redundant
defaultproperty from the second TabItem.Both TabItem entries at lines 152 and 162 are marked
default. Docusaurus selects the first tab marked as default in document order, making the second one redundant. Keep thedefaulton the first tab only (line 152: "Ory Network").🤖 Prompt for AI Agents