Add support for host features. #91
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
| # Host features | ||
|
|
||
| | Identifier | Name | Values | Deprecated | | ||
| |:----------:|:-------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:----------:| | ||
| | 0x0001 | `HAS_CORE` | When `1`, all baseline functions considered essential are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0002 | `HAS_LOGGING` | When `1`, all baseline functions for logging are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0003 | `HAS_HTTP_HEADERS` | When `1`, only baseline functions related to HTTP headers are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0004 | `HAS_HTTP_WITH_BODY` | When `1`, all baseline functions for HTTP are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0005 | `HAS_HTTP_CALLS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for HTTP calls are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0006 | `HAS_GRPC_CALLS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for gRPC calls are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0007 | `HAS_GRPC_STREAMS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for gRPC streams are supported. | No | | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. I'm not sure if it's worth it to separate streaming from unary gRPC, it's hard for me to imagine a host supporting only non-streaming gRPC. |
||
| | 0x0008 | `HAS_TCP_FILTER` | When `1`, only baseline functions related to new TCP connections are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0009 | `HAS_TCP_WITH_PAYLOAD` | When `1`, all baseline functions for TCP are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000A | `HAS_KEY_VALUE_STORES` | When `1`, all baseline functions for key-value stores are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000B | `HAS_SHARED_QUEUES` | When `1`, all baseline functions for shared queues are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000C | `HAS_TIMERS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for timers are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000D | `HAS_METRICS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for metrics are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000E | `HAS_PROPERTIES` | When `1`, all baseline functions for properties are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x000F | `HAS_CUSTOM_FUNCTIONS` | When `1`, all baseline functions for custom functions are supported. | No | | ||
| | 0x0F01 | `HAS_WASI_PREVIEW1_CORE` | When `1`, all baseline functions considered essential from WASI Preview1 are supported. | No | | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. With |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Identifiers below 0x2000 are reserved for standardized features and options. Random numbers above that range should be used for private extensions. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Do you expect that when a new feature intended for eventual standardization is added, it would start off with an ID above 0x2000 while still in experimental state, and then later switch to a standard ID? |
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree it's best to be explicit, but just out of curiosity, is there ever a case where this bit wouldn't be set?