Skip to content

Avoid double-nested recursive-contract for Name types resolving to Mu#1496

Merged
samth merged 1 commit intoracket:masterfrom
samth:fix-double-recursive-contract
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

Avoid double-nested recursive-contract for Name types resolving to Mu#1496
samth merged 1 commit intoracket:masterfrom
samth:fix-double-recursive-contract

Conversation

@samth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@samth samth commented Feb 26, 2026

No description provided.

@samth samth force-pushed the fix-double-recursive-contract branch from de87ec7 to b47fb10 Compare February 26, 2026 12:25
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 4 files in this pull request and found no issues.

@samth samth force-pushed the fix-double-recursive-contract branch from b47fb10 to ec930fe Compare March 5, 2026 00:07
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resyntax analyzed 4 files in this pull request and found no issues.

@samth samth merged commit 99abd84 into racket:master Mar 5, 2026
3 checks passed
@samth samth deleted the fix-double-recursive-contract branch March 5, 2026 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant