Conversation
ddddfcf to
7d4847e
Compare
|
@dotrachit Wanted to ensure you had interest in me continuing down this path before doing any further work, hence why some of the |
Yes, definitely. I'll do a detailed review of the PR in some time, but yes I believe these changes are quite important. @emacsified |
|
@emacsified do we really need to refactoring stuff to typescript? |
|
@dotrachit That's why I raised this PR as a WIP. It depends on your definition of 'need'! If you feel TS is an additional cross you do not wish to bear I'm happy to open a new PR with just the refactoring and no Types |
@emacsified Yeah, I don't feel the need to add typescript as of now, considering that we've not received a good enough response from few developers about the project idea. I would love to see you contribute by refactoring the code style and over-used chunks of code because having a good source code is really important. Also, If you're up to discuss the potential use-case and viability of this dev-tool, please write me a mail at guptarachit2004[at]gmail[dot]com. |
Hi!
I know I didn't open an issue in advance but wondered whether you'd have any interest in this:
tscasync/await.I'm happy to continue implementing similar changes but wanted to wave this under your noses first!