Skip to content

Conversation

@alejandro-colomar
Copy link
Collaborator

@alejandro-colomar alejandro-colomar commented Dec 14, 2025

Cc: @kees


An interesting detail is that we require the second argument to be
non-const, while the memmove(3) function gets a const void*.  This is
because the second argument should usually be just the same as the first
one, plus some offset, and thus will have the same const qualification
(that is, it will not be qualified).

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
@alejandro-colomar alejandro-colomar marked this pull request as ready for review January 1, 2026 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant