Skip to content

chore: support snykPolicy/v1 in local findings#281

Merged
j-luong merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
CLI-595-support-severity-policy
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

chore: support snykPolicy/v1 in local findings#281
j-luong merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
CLI-595-support-severity-policy

Conversation

@sandor-trombitas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@sandor-trombitas sandor-trombitas requested review from a team as code owners November 22, 2024 14:21
Comment thread pkg/local_workflows/testdata/sarif-snyk-goof-ignores.json
Comment thread pkg/local_workflows/output_workflow_test.go Outdated
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer force-pushed the CLI-595-support-severity-policy branch from 620b2ec to 0d5d6f6 Compare December 2, 2024 15:08
@j-luong j-luong merged commit 1b71b7f into main Dec 2, 2024
@j-luong j-luong deleted the CLI-595-support-severity-policy branch December 2, 2024 16:15
Comment on lines +2064 to +2068
"snykPolicy/v1": {
"originalLevel": "warning",
"severity": "high",
"originalSeverity": "low"
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@j-luong @PeterSchafer do you guys know how this test was generated? It seems we don't have "what" actually generates this, and I'll need it for #595

If you guys know how to properly generate or know how to change Security Policies so can have some value for policy_modifications in the payload, that will help a lot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants