Skip to content

[Aikido] AI Fix for Path traversal attack possible#134

Merged
softberries merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/aikido-security-sast-28719942-3rfm
May 8, 2026
Merged

[Aikido] AI Fix for Path traversal attack possible#134
softberries merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/aikido-security-sast-28719942-3rfm

Conversation

@aikido-autofix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aikido-autofix aikido-autofix Bot commented May 1, 2026

This patch mitigates the risk of path traversal attacks by validating file paths and preventing access to directories outside the intended scope.

Aikido used AI to generate this PR.

Medium confidence: Aikido has validated similar fixes and observed positive outcomes. Validation is required.

.peel_to_commit()
.map_err(|e| AppError::BadRequest(format!("Ref is not a commit: {e}")))?;

// Prevent path traversal attacks by rejecting paths containing '..'.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate inline path traversal validation added in handler; extract into a shared helper to avoid repeated logic and reduce file bloat.

Details

✨ AI Reasoning
​The change adds repeated path traversal validation blocks into multiple request-handling functions. This introduces duplicated logic (same Path::new + components check + identical error handling) in several places, increasing code duplication and the file's size. Duplicated validation scattered across handlers makes future updates/error message changes error-prone and contributes to maintainability issues in an already large source file. A single shared helper would reduce duplication and keep the file more focused.

🔧 How do I fix it?
Split large files into smaller, focused modules. Each file should have a single responsibility.

Reply @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info

@softberries softberries merged commit 5f0217c into main May 8, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant