Skip to content

[Aikido] AI Fix for Path traversal attack possible#138

Open
aikido-autofix[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/aikido-security-sast-31983878-kkzn
Open

[Aikido] AI Fix for Path traversal attack possible#138
aikido-autofix[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/aikido-security-sast-31983878-kkzn

Conversation

@aikido-autofix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aikido-autofix aikido-autofix Bot commented May 9, 2026

This patch mitigates the risk of path traversal attacks by validating file paths and preventing access to directories outside the intended scope.

Aikido used AI to generate this PR.

Medium confidence: Aikido has validated similar fixes and observed positive outcomes. Validation is required.

let target_tree = if query.path.is_empty() || query.path == "/" {
tree
} else {
// Prevent path traversal attacks by rejecting paths containing '..'.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Multiple endpoints now contain duplicated inline path traversal checks; extract a common helper to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.

Details

✨ AI Reasoning
​The PR adds repeated logic that validates paths by constructing std::path::Path and checking for ParentDir components in multiple request handlers. Each added block performs the same responsibility (path traversal validation) inline inside distinct endpoint functions. This increases code duplication and the file's complexity, making behavior harder to update or audit. A small, focused helper would centralize validation and reduce repetition, improving maintainability without a large refactor.

🔧 How do I fix it?
Split large files into smaller, focused modules. Each file should have a single responsibility.

Reply @AikidoSec feedback: [FEEDBACK] to get better review comments in the future.
Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants