(Closes #3435) Metatrans docs#3438
Draft
LonelyCat124 wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3438 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.96% 99.95% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 391 391
Lines 54668 54728 +60
==========================================
+ Hits 54649 54701 +52
- Misses 19 27 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the initial stage to have support for docs from _SUB_TRANSFORMATIONS supported.
There are remaining issues to fix:
MaximalOMPParallelRegionTransinherits thenode_type_checkfromRegionTrans, but then also finds it imported from itsSUB_TRANSFORMATIONclass. @sergisiso Do you think I should avoid repeated docstrings? Should it be limited in some way to only be if the strings are==? I think I can do that check (as the "Option used for ...") is added later.