I'm Urav. I build things with code.
Every day a bot grabs a commit (one of mine, someone I follow, or a stranger's), an AI names and roasts it, and it ends up as a strange attractor.
Chaos ββββββββββ 15 Β· Mood
github/spec-kit by @mnriem Β· c47f334
chore: release 0.8.14, begin 0.8.15.dev0 development (#2706)
* chore: bump version to 0.8.14
* chore: begin 0.8.15.dev0 development
β¦
Another glorious cycle completes, with bots co-authoring the inevitable version bump and changelog update. This is a perfectly mechanical 'chore', proving that the wheels of progress, even the tiny ones, keep turning on schedule. The future date in the changelog entry is a delightful touch, ensuring someone is always thinking ahead.
captured 2026-05-26
What is this?
flowchart LR
commit["π daily commit"] -->|diff| gemini["Gemini"]
gemini -->|chaos + mood| attractor["Lorenz attractor"]
gemini -->|title + roast| exhibit["today's exhibit"]
attractor --> exhibit
A GitHub Action runs daily and picks a commit: mine if I've pushed recently, otherwise something from my network or a starred repo, and the Linux genesis commit as a last resort. Gemini gives it a name, a roast, a chaos score (0-100), and a mood color. Those become a Lorenz attractor: chaos controls how wild the butterfly gets, mood tints the gradient, and the commit hash sets the starting point. The math is identical every run, so the commit is the only thing that changes the picture.

