Unstructured cookbook

[SIDDHAARTHAA]

Pull Request Checklist

Please ensure that your PR meets the following requirements:

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING guide.
• I have updated the documentation (if applicable).
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.

Description

Adds a focused Unstructured + Moss cookbook for parsing raw files, chunking extracted content, preserving metadata, and incrementally upserting chunks into a Moss index for semantic search.

The cookbook includes a runnable ingestion script, sample documents, environment template, and setup/usage documentation.

Validation performed:

• python -m py_compile examples/cookbook/unstructured/ingest.py

Fixes #203

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

---

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[devin-ai-integration]

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

View 2 additional findings in Devin Review.

[devin-ai-integration]

🚩 Other cookbook examples include test files; this one does not

The langchain cookbook has test_integration.py, haystack has test_live.py, and crewai has test_live.py. This PR's unstructured cookbook has no test file. The CONTRIBUTING.md states "If you've added code that should be tested, add tests." For a cookbook/example script this is somewhat subjective — the dspy cookbook also lacks a test file — but it is a deviation from the majority pattern. Consider adding at least a minimal integration/smoke test for consistency.

---

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

[yatharthk2]

Hi @SIDDHAARTHAA , thank you very much for working on this pr. Were you able to resolve all the comments from ai ? also can you please record a short 1 min video demonstrating the demo of implementation.

[SIDDHAARTHAA]

Hey @yatharthk2, thanks for checking out. I’m working on it.