Skip to content

[DOCS-1898] SCIM API support for creating a team with BYOB storage#2264

Open
mdlinville wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
DOCS-1898
Open

[DOCS-1898] SCIM API support for creating a team with BYOB storage#2264
mdlinville wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
DOCS-1898

Conversation

@mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor

@mdlinville mdlinville commented Mar 10, 2026

Description

DOCS-1898 SCIM API support for creating a team with BYOB storage

Testing

  • Local build succeeds without errors (mint dev)
  • Local link check succeeds without errors (mint broken-links)
  • PR tests succeed

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

📚 Mintlify Preview Links

🔗 View Full Preview

📝 Changed (2 total)

📄 Pages (2)

File Preview
platform/hosting/data-security/secure-storage-connector.mdx Secure Storage Connector
platform/hosting/iam/scim.mdx Scim

🤖 Generated automatically when Mintlify deployment succeeds
📍 Deployment: d8709b0 at 2026-03-12 20:52:23 UTC

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

🔗 Link Checker Results

All links are valid!

No broken links were detected.

Checked against: https://wb-21fd5541-docs-1898.mintlify.app

Copy link
Contributor

@niall-wb niall-wb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What you have looks good, but I think we should probably provide examples for each of the storage providers that we support. I sent you an example for each in this thread. https://weightsandbiases.slack.com/archives/C069VUZS152/p1770251353361269?thread_ts=1770250332.682799&cid=C069VUZS152 Seems important because there are slight differences for each

@mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor Author

What you have looks good, but I think we should probably provide examples for each of the storage providers that we support. I sent you an example for each in this thread. https://weightsandbiases.slack.com/archives/C069VUZS152/p1770251353361269?thread_ts=1770250332.682799&cid=C069VUZS152 Seems important because there are slight differences for each

Done, thanks for the reminder! I handled the tabbed output a bit differently for these examples, with a request example per cloud provider but only a single response tab.

@mdlinville mdlinville requested a review from niall-wb March 12, 2026 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants