Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@esimkowitz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new helper function that handles file and directory copying within the remote file copy command. The new function centralizes the logic used to check for existing destination files and directories, while managing options such as overwrite or merge. In the updated implementation, a conditional check determines whether the source is a directory; if so, the code traverses the directory tree and applies the file copy logic to each encountered file. The existing approach, which relied on directly renaming files using system calls, has been replaced with recursive file traversal for directory handling. Additionally, error handling has been revised to check file and directory states more explicitly, providing specific error messages based on the encountered conditions. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go
450-450: SA5001: should check error returned from os.Open() before deferring file.Close()
(staticcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
I was dumb and used `os.Rename` for copy on the same WSH remote. This change makes it a proper copy, with recursion if needed. --------- Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 participant
I was dumb and used
os.Renamefor copy on the same WSH remote. This change makes it a proper copy, with recursion if needed.