feat(ui): Analysis UI

[chrisgalanis]

This pull request introduces a new mechanism for selecting operator default colors based on the current release type (such as "Analysis" or "Prod") for both Pearl and Diamond orb types. It achieves this by reading the OS release type at runtime and updating the logic throughout the codebase to use the appropriate color constants. Additionally, new color constants specific to the "Analysis" release type are added.

Release-type aware color selection:

• Added a global static RELEASE_TYPE (using LazyLock) in ui/src/main.rs that reads the current OrbRelease from /etc/os-release, defaulting to Prod if unavailable.
• Introduced helper functions pearl_operator_default() and diamond_operator_default() in ui/src/engine/mod.rs to select the correct color constant based on RELEASE_TYPE.
• Updated all usages of PEARL_OPERATOR_DEFAULT and DIAMOND_OPERATOR_DEFAULT in operator logic (idle, pulse, signup_phase, and runner modules) to use the new helper functions, ensuring color selection is dynamic based on release type. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

New color constants:

• Added PEARL_OPERATOR_ANALYSIS and DIAMOND_OPERATOR_ANALYSIS color constants to the Argb implementation for use in the "Analysis" release type. [1] [2]

Dependency and import updates:

• Added once_cell and updated orb-info dependencies in ui/Cargo.toml to support the new static initialization.
• Updated imports in ui/src/engine/mod.rs and ui/src/main.rs to include orb_info::orb_os_release::{OrbOsRelease, OrbRelease} and related types. [1] [2]

[AlexKaravaev]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ecfc4d1284

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chrisgalanis]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dd2789ad57

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chrisgalanis]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chrisgalanis]

@cursor review

[chrisgalanis]

Thanks for the Review @AlexKaravaev ! I will merge after I test the binary:

• On Analysis Pearl/Diamond
• On Dev Pearl/Diamond