Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Jan 2, 2026


Latest Update: v40 — Compare vs v39

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v39 v38 v37 v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v40 v39 v38 v37 v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v39 v38 v37 v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v38 v37 v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v37 v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v36 v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v35 v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v34 v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v33 v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v32 v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v31 v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v30 v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v29 v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v28 v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v27 v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v26 v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v25 v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v24 v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v23 v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v22 v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v21 v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v20 v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v19 v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v18 v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v17 v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v16 v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v15 v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v14 v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v13 v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new ReadOnly<T> wrapper type designed to enforce read-only access to its inner value, integrating it deeply into the existing type system for low-level memory and pointer manipulation. It also lays the groundwork for handling projections through wrapped types by defining new Wrapped and HasWrappedField traits, which are then implemented for ReadOnly<T> as well as standard library types like MaybeUninit and Wrapping. This work is currently in progress, as indicated by the [WIP] title and numerous TODO comments, signifying that further documentation and safety considerations are pending.

Highlights

  • Introduction of ReadOnly: A new #[repr(transparent)] struct ReadOnly<T> is added, intended to provide a read-only view of an underlying type T. This wrapper is designed to integrate seamlessly with the existing type system for low-level memory and pointer manipulation.
  • New Pointer Casting Traits: The src/pointer/mod.rs file introduces new unsafe traits, Wrapped and HasWrappedField, which are crucial for facilitating advanced casting and projection operations involving wrapped types. These traits define how to 'unwrap' a type and how to project fields within wrapped structures.
  • Integration with Existing Type System: ReadOnly<T> is extensively integrated with various existing traits, including KnownLayout, Unaligned, TryFromBytes, FromZeros, FromBytes, IntoBytes, Immutable, SizeEq, and TransmuteFrom. It also implements the newly introduced Wrapped and HasWrappedField traits, ensuring its compatibility and utility within the framework.
  • Standard Library Type Support: The new Wrapped and HasWrappedField traits are implemented for standard library types such as MaybeUninit<T> and Wrapping<T>, demonstrating their general applicability and laying the groundwork for consistent handling of wrapped data structures.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new ReadOnly<T> wrapper type. While it's a work in progress, there are two critical issues with the current implementation that need to be addressed. First, ReadOnly<T> incorrectly implements DerefMut, which contradicts its purpose and allows mutation of the wrapped data. Second, it has an unsound unconditional unsafe impl of the Immutable trait, which can lead to undefined behavior by violating one of the core safety invariants of zerocopy. I've provided detailed comments and suggestions for both of these critical issues.

src/wrappers.rs Outdated
Comment on lines 627 to 630
// SAFETY: TODO
const _: () = unsafe {
unsafe_impl!(T: ?Sized => Immutable for ReadOnly<T>);
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The unconditional unsafe impl<T: ?Sized> Immutable for ReadOnly<T> is unsound. The Immutable trait is a promise that the type has no interior mutability (i.e., no UnsafeCells). Since ReadOnly<T> is a #[repr(transparent)] wrapper, it will contain an UnsafeCell if T does. For example, if T is Cell<u8>, ReadOnly<Cell<u8>> would be marked Immutable despite containing an UnsafeCell. This violates a fundamental safety invariant of zerocopy and can lead to undefined behavior, for example when zerocopy performs unsynchronized reads on types it believes to be Immutable.

If ReadOnly<T> is intended to be Immutable, it must be bounded on T: Immutable. If it's intended to be used with types that are not Immutable, then ReadOnly<T> itself cannot be Immutable.

Suggested change
// SAFETY: TODO
const _: () = unsafe {
unsafe_impl!(T: ?Sized => Immutable for ReadOnly<T>);
};
// SAFETY: `ReadOnly<T>` is a transparent wrapper over `T`. Thus, it is
// `Immutable` if and only if `T` is.
const _: () = unsafe {
unsafe_impl!(T: ?Sized + Immutable => Immutable for ReadOnly<T>);
};

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9@ade58d5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/wrappers.rs 0.00% 23 Missing ⚠️
src/pointer/mod.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                             Coverage Diff                              @@
##             G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9    #2866   +/-   ##
============================================================================
  Coverage                                             ?   91.39%           
============================================================================
  Files                                                ?       20           
  Lines                                                ?     5915           
  Branches                                             ?        0           
============================================================================
  Hits                                                 ?     5406           
  Misses                                               ?      509           
  Partials                                             ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from ba5b262 to 7ad85b6 Compare January 2, 2026 20:36
@joshlf joshlf changed the base branch from Gdeb4f5a282b778a82175703218739a93074d0cc4 to Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 January 2, 2026 20:36
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 3e60851 to 5db7a0c Compare January 5, 2026 20:08
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 7ad85b6 to 6192561 Compare January 5, 2026 20:08
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 5db7a0c to 155e82d Compare January 6, 2026 16:21
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 6192561 to 3d9d244 Compare January 6, 2026 16:21
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 155e82d to 52ce959 Compare January 6, 2026 16:35
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch 2 times, most recently from 4ca0e13 to be7520a Compare January 6, 2026 16:42
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch 2 times, most recently from 2dd1cbd to e933a0e Compare January 7, 2026 18:07
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch 2 times, most recently from 4c19d75 to ad978ce Compare January 7, 2026 21:28
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from e933a0e to 27689d2 Compare January 7, 2026 21:28
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from ad978ce to ee75641 Compare January 7, 2026 23:08
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 27689d2 to d9c3cc0 Compare January 8, 2026 15:26
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch 2 times, most recently from 6539cee to e2f1bc3 Compare January 8, 2026 15:36
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from d9c3cc0 to 28de514 Compare January 8, 2026 15:36
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from e2f1bc3 to 45ff87c Compare January 8, 2026 15:58
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 318b671 to 9230a53 Compare January 9, 2026 16:57
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from 796deda to 4ef287c Compare January 9, 2026 17:22
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 9230a53 to 3c09949 Compare January 9, 2026 17:22
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from 4ef287c to 9e67acb Compare January 15, 2026 23:32
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 3c09949 to 96ff8da Compare January 15, 2026 23:32
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from 9e67acb to a9e1eb5 Compare January 16, 2026 00:02
@joshlf joshlf changed the title [WIP] ReadOnly [WIP] ReadOnly, CastExact Jan 16, 2026
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 96ff8da to 2a423af Compare January 16, 2026 00:02
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from a9e1eb5 to 413a87a Compare January 16, 2026 00:29
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 2a423af to 7df6e77 Compare January 16, 2026 00:29
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from 413a87a to c89b776 Compare January 16, 2026 00:35
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 7df6e77 to ee361d2 Compare January 16, 2026 00:35
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from ee361d2 to 5db40fd Compare January 16, 2026 00:41
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from c89b776 to e7bc4a5 Compare January 16, 2026 00:41
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 5db40fd to a916f8f Compare January 16, 2026 00:54
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch 2 times, most recently from 1c0f716 to a000e49 Compare January 16, 2026 01:01
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch 2 times, most recently from ca87cfd to 56473d2 Compare January 16, 2026 01:14
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch 2 times, most recently from b77e3a2 to f29bc13 Compare January 16, 2026 19:00
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 56473d2 to 374d785 Compare January 16, 2026 19:00
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from f29bc13 to 5dac13c Compare January 16, 2026 20:37
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 374d785 to 2443118 Compare January 16, 2026 20:37
gherrit-pr-id: Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 branch from 5dac13c to ade58d5 Compare January 16, 2026 20:57
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbe8d7edd150d80731c79815685c596ed88460ae7 branch from 2443118 to ab5e943 Compare January 16, 2026 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants