-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
Tighten impl of CastUnsized #2887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the implementation of Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request tightens the implementation of CastUnsized by moving the alignment check to only apply to slice DSTs and improving the safety proof. The changes look good, but I've found a small discrepancy between the updated safety comment and the implementation for slice DSTs. The comment implies an equality check for alignment to preserve size, while the code uses a greater-than-or-equal check, which could lead to shrinking casts. My suggestion aims to align the code with the documented safety invariants.
7886b0a to
034707a
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2887 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.82% 91.82%
=======================================
Files 20 20
Lines 5883 5883
=======================================
Hits 5402 5402
Misses 481 481 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
034707a to
c17d945
Compare
Migrate alignment check from unconditional to only applying to the slice DST case. Improve detail of safety proof. gherrit-pr-id: G2eb58496ed1e3c61421020abbbb694d970d43c1c
c17d945 to
07d042b
Compare
Migrate alignment check from unconditional to only applying to the slice
DST case. Improve detail of safety proof.
Latest Update: v10 — Compare vs v9
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.