Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Jan 16, 2026

Migrate alignment check from unconditional to only applying to the slice
DST case. Improve detail of safety proof.


Latest Update: v10 — Compare vs v9

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the implementation of CastUnsized by making its alignment check more precise, applying it only when casting between slice DSTs. This change improves the correctness and clarity of the type casting mechanism, ensuring that safety assertions are accurately tailored to the specific layout properties of the types involved. Additionally, the documentation for the safety proof has been enhanced to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying guarantees.

Highlights

  • Refined Alignment Check: The alignment check within the static_assert! for CastUnsized has been migrated to apply specifically to the slice Dynamically Sized Type (DST) case, rather than being applied unconditionally. This ensures the check is relevant to the specific type of DST being cast.
  • Improved Safety Proof Documentation: The safety comment for the unsafe impl<Src, Dst> Project<Src, Dst> for CastUnsized has been updated to provide a more detailed explanation of the conditions under which Src and Dst are considered compatible for casting, clarifying the rationale behind the static_assert!.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@joshlf joshlf requested a review from jswrenn January 16, 2026 00:35
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request tightens the implementation of CastUnsized by moving the alignment check to only apply to slice DSTs and improving the safety proof. The changes look good, but I've found a small discrepancy between the updated safety comment and the implementation for slice DSTs. The comment implies an equality check for alignment to preserve size, while the code uses a greater-than-or-equal check, which could lead to shrinking casts. My suggestion aims to align the code with the documented safety invariants.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G2eb58496ed1e3c61421020abbbb694d970d43c1c branch from 7886b0a to 034707a Compare January 16, 2026 00:41
@joshlf joshlf enabled auto-merge January 16, 2026 00:42
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.82%. Comparing base (48bf69f) to head (07d042b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2887   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.82%   91.82%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        5883     5883           
=======================================
  Hits         5402     5402           
  Misses        481      481           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G2eb58496ed1e3c61421020abbbb694d970d43c1c branch from 034707a to c17d945 Compare January 16, 2026 19:00
Migrate alignment check from unconditional to only applying to the slice
DST case. Improve detail of safety proof.

gherrit-pr-id: G2eb58496ed1e3c61421020abbbb694d970d43c1c
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the G2eb58496ed1e3c61421020abbbb694d970d43c1c branch from c17d945 to 07d042b Compare January 16, 2026 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants