Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Jan 8, 2026

Previously, we allowed for Src: Read<A, R> and Dst: Read<A, S> for
different R and S "reason" parameters. This is an unnecessary degree
of freedom (two types are only ever Read<A> for a particular A for
the same reason – either because A = Exclusive or because both types
implement Immutable). This degree of freedom required more verbose
type annotations by callers.


Previously, we allowed for `Src: Read<A, R>` and `Dst: Read<A, S>` for
different `R` and `S` "reason" parameters. This is an unnecessary degree
of freedom (two types are only ever `Read<A>` for a particular `A` for
the same reason – either because `A = Exclusive` or because both types
implement `Immutable`). This degree of freedom required more verbose
type annotations by callers.

gherrit-pr-id: G3cc35009cf6e17a935df0ae0c3c37dcc389e2f9f
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the internal type system, specifically simplifying the MutationCompatible trait's implementation by unifying the 'reason' type parameter for Read trait bounds. This change eliminates an unnecessary degree of freedom in type definitions, resulting in more concise and clearer type annotations throughout the codebase. The modifications primarily affect how types are constrained and cast, leading to a more streamlined and maintainable type system.

Highlights

  • Type Parameter Simplification: The MutationCompatible trait implementation has been simplified by removing an unnecessary degree of freedom in its type parameters. Previously, Src and Dst types could implement Read<A, R> and Read<A, S> with different 'reason' parameters R and S. This change enforces that both Src and Dst must implement Read<A, R> for the same reason R, as this was implicitly true in practice.
  • Reduced Type Annotation Verbosity: This simplification directly leads to less verbose type annotations for callers, as the redundant S type parameter is no longer required in the MutationCompatible trait's reason tuple, changing (BecauseRead, (R, S)) to (BecauseRead, R).
  • Explicit Trait Bounds for [u8]: Explicit [u8]: Read<A, R> trait bounds were added to as_bytes and cast_into_no_leftover methods in src/pointer/ptr.rs. This addresses a current limitation where Rust's type system doesn't automatically infer that T: Read<A, R> implies [u8]: Read<A, R].
  • Consistent Type Parameter Usage: Across the codebase, various recall_validity, cast_for_sized, and transmute calls have been updated to reflect the simplified type parameter structure, changing instances of (_, (_, (BecauseExclusive, BecauseExclusive))) to (_, (_, BecauseExclusive)).
  • Test Case Updates: Corresponding test cases in zerocopy-derive/tests/struct_try_from_bytes.rs and zerocopy-derive/tests/union_try_from_bytes.rs have been updated to align with the new, simplified type parameter usage in cast calls.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.90%. Comparing base (1ed124b) to head (b85ccfe).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/util/macros.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2877   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.90%   91.90%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        5878     5878           
=======================================
  Hits         5402     5402           
  Misses        476      476           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request simplifies the MutationCompatible trait implementation by removing an unnecessary degree of freedom in its generic parameters. Previously, it allowed source and destination types to have different "reason" parameters for the Read trait, which is now constrained to be the same. This change simplifies the trait and makes type annotations at call sites less verbose. I've reviewed the changes, and they are consistent and correctly propagated throughout the codebase, including updates to function signatures and test cases. The addition of the [u8]: Read<I::Aliasing, R> bound where necessary is a correct consequence of this simplification. The refactoring is well-executed and improves the code's clarity.

@joshlf joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 8, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5e71c61 Jan 8, 2026
103 checks passed
@joshlf joshlf deleted the G3cc35009cf6e17a935df0ae0c3c37dcc389e2f9f branch January 8, 2026 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants